Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Parking Lot

Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc.


The Grand New Party

Parking Lot


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2009, 11:09 AM   #76
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Seatbelt laws are by state and VA just passed that law just a few years back.
Yes they are, but why do you think VA passed it, if you check i believe you will find Federal Funding attached.

My point on the seatbelt law was more that government does not cycle, it grows and weaves, altering course but rarely repealing intrusive laws (an exception being if they make an overt and overreaching prohibition such as Prohibition).

Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 05-19-2009 at 11:12 AM. Reason: clarification
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-19-2009, 12:31 PM   #77
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Yes they are, but why do you think VA passed it, if you check i believe you will find Federal Funding attached.

My point on the seatbelt law was more that government does not cycle, it grows and weaves, altering course but rarely repealing intrusive laws (an exception being if they make an overt and overreaching prohibition such as Prohibition).
Not sure if its attached to federal funding but we do have HOV lanes in our area that I do know that we have to keep open due to federal funding. Its crazy we have these lanes as they get little use and they would be better used as just another lane to help with trafic.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 01:31 PM   #78
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Well now this new party will have to take into account that the Pro-Life now has more supporters then Pro-Choice for the first time sensen they have been tracking this galup poll.More Americans “Pro-Life” Than “Pro-Choice” for First Time
I did not want to start an abortion thread but I found this pool really interesting.
But what does it mean to be "pro-life" ??

That same poll says that even though 51% of people define themselves that way, 22% say that abortion should be legal in all cases, and 53% say that it should be legal in some cases -- meaning that 75% still say that abortion should not be completely outlawed.

If any Republican attempts to run on a national platform of making abortion illegal, then that candidate will lose and the party is going absolutely nowhere.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 01:57 PM   #79
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
But what does it mean to be "pro-life" ??

That same poll says that even though 51% of people define themselves that way, 22% say that abortion should be legal in all cases, and 53% say that it should be legal in some cases -- meaning that 75% still say that abortion should not be completely outlawed.

If any Republican attempts to run on a national platform of making abortion illegal, then that candidate will lose and the party is going absolutely nowhere.
Well some cases could be rape or the health of the mother so that number is hard to grasp. I just really posted this because I have seen several people here say that on abortion the Rep. party does not have a clue but this poll may suggest something different. I don't think anyone would have any traction with either oarty if they took the far left or far right stance on the abortion issue. It seem now that both parties are some where in the middle.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 02:51 PM   #80
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Not sure if its attached to federal funding but we do have HOV lanes in our area that I do know that we have to keep open due to federal funding. Its crazy we have these lanes as they get little use and they would be better used as just another lane to help with trafic.
Or people could get off their ass and actually carpool. That'd help traffic too.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 02:54 PM   #81
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Well some cases could be rape or the health of the mother so that number is hard to grasp. I just really posted this because I have seen several people here say that on abortion the Rep. party does not have a clue but this poll may suggest something different. I don't think anyone would have any traction with either oarty if they took the far left or far right stance on the abortion issue. It seem now that both parties are some where in the middle.
I think the poll actually shows why the Pubs have such a hard time. The question of abortion isn't cut and dry in most minds and that poll clearly shows it. When pressed most people allow for abortions in at least some cases. Tell them you're going to outlaw it and suddenly a lot of those people aren't so sure they want to vote for you. At least the dopes who decide whether to vote for someone based on one singular social issue that is about as important to the everyday functioning of our country as Paris Hilton is.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 03:07 PM   #82
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Has anyone here read "Grand New Party"?
I looked at the synopsis online, that's about all. Didn't know it was a book till you asked that.
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 03:09 PM   #83
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
^^ Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
Or more likely ignored till the thought of a small functional government is but a speck in the tear ducts of the galaxy
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 03:44 PM   #84
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I looked at the synopsis online, that's about all. Didn't know it was a book till you asked that.
I'd previously heard of the book, but have never read it.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 04:03 PM   #85
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I think the poll actually shows why the Pubs have such a hard time. The question of abortion isn't cut and dry in most minds and that poll clearly shows it. When pressed most people allow for abortions in at least some cases. Tell them you're going to outlaw it and suddenly a lot of those people aren't so sure they want to vote for you. At least the dopes who decide whether to vote for someone based on one singular social issue that is about as important to the everyday functioning of our country as Paris Hilton is.
I agree with your assessment. It really is a grey area and not as black and white, at least not in every instance, as some would like to make it. That being said, there's a reasonable argument to made on both sides of the issue.

I find it intriguing how nothing will get people up in arms like the topic of abortion and a woman's right to choose. This debate isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 05:07 PM   #86
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: The Grand New Party

its also funny how that topic only surfaces come election time. now it will fade away for the next 3.5 years
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 05:13 PM   #87
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I think the poll actually shows why the Pubs have such a hard time. The question of abortion isn't cut and dry in most minds and that poll clearly shows it. When pressed most people allow for abortions in at least some cases. Tell them you're going to outlaw it and suddenly a lot of those people aren't so sure they want to vote for you. At least the dopes who decide whether to vote for someone based on one singular social issue that is about as important to the everyday functioning of our country as Paris Hilton is.
Your assuming that the Rep. party is totaly suported by people who believe that any abortion is bad no matter what the case is and I'd say thats a very small % and the party knows that. Its the same thing as thinking that all people who are pro choice think that having an abortion anytime is a womens right. See the far right of the rep. party actually have a means to get their point out through their own net works so we hear more from them. The far left is really only heard from when they are out protesting and busting up stuff.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 05:21 PM   #88
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
its also funny how that topic only surfaces come election time. now it will fade away for the next 3.5 years
It may have to do with the fact that, at this point, there are only 9 people who really have a say in changing this policy, and each one has a REAL LONG term. Thus, most people know they can't really impact this policy except at the Presidential level.

Obviously this is a Federal issue, because the Supreme Court made it one, but still should not be a "litmus test" for whether a person wants a restrained Federal Government.

" I close my eyes only for a moment and the moment's gone ... dust in the wind, all we are is dust in the wind."
Kansas
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 05:43 PM   #89
Trample the Elderly
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
Re: The Grand New Party

Anyone hear about how the new CAFE auto standards are going to raise the prices on every aspect of driving? Thank you Democrats.
Trample the Elderly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 06:03 PM   #90
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: The Grand New Party

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly View Post
Anyone hear about how the new CAFE auto standards are going to raise the prices on every aspect of driving? Thank you Democrats.
Hey the car companies are in horrible shape. Lets put more restrictions and standards on them to help everyone out. It makes perfect sense.
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.42885 seconds with 10 queries