![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#91 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: It's Not Just Brunell
Quote:
i would fire Jerry Gray in the offseason, the DB position has gone nothing but down in every category. I'd put Rocky in and have him learn also, maybe experiment with a 3-4 with Carter as an LB, maybe even Arch. who knows, anything. my point is, and has always been, that most of these problems can't be fixed now. at least the QB position can.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#92 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 63
Posts: 2,507
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
Mark can't even go deep in bed" - Mrs Brunell
If at best you can say Mark swallows after he sucks. I had an Ex-wife thatdid the same. ![]() EDIT:taht to that
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star. Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
The defense was bad, but Brunell gave us absolutely NO chance to win. He led us to 3 points and gave the Eagles 7 with his terrible INT for a touchdown. Gibbs' decision to start Brunell this season is the No. 1 reason we're moving backward and will finish with a losing record.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
True. He hurt us more than helped. Sadly, the prettiest pass of the day came from ARE, even though it was knocked away.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
I said this a couple weeks ago, but I will say it again. Brunell doesn't give us the best chance to win now. He isn't good. He stares down one receiver the entire play, then he either throws it to them or throws it away. He is basically a rookie out there. I get excited when he actually throws down the middle, steps up in the pocket, looks off a defender, pump fakes, or throws farther than 10 yards. You shouldn't have to worry about those things with a 15 year veteran. He just isn't a good quarterback anymore. His career is over.
Campbell needs to be put in now. That stuff I just said doesn't even really matter anymore because we have no chance at making the playoffs anyway unless we somehow win 7 in a row. There is absolutely no reason at all to leave Brunell in. Gibbs is an idiot if he does. edit: If Brunell gave us the best chance to win, we wouldn't be 3-6. That is what we were when Gibbs benched him in '04. He didn't give us the best chance then, and he doesn't now either.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
It will be an interesting week around Redskins Park. I hope Gibbs doesn't praise Brunell's performance again because it would be totally hollow. Brunell played a poor ball today, bottom line. Sadly enough, if we continue to play like we have been and finish 6-10 or 5-11, Gibbs Act 2 could have a similar winning (losing) percentage as Spurrier.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
Quote:
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
Isn't time for your to change your name?
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
Did anyone see the brunell press conference after the game? It looked like he was about to cry.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
I hope that means, he knows he lost his job.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)
What about the pass to BL?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Brunell only looks at Moss
Quote:
His playcalling is the way it is because he knows Brunell cannot throw the ball acurately downfield on a consistent basis. He therefore stays with what he believes Brunell can do, which is limited. Much different than the offense we saw his team run in KC.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Brunell only looks at Moss
I totally agree. Remember how Saunders was brought in because he was going to establish a vertical attack? Saunders said he was committed to establishing the deep threat, we got the receivers to make it happen, but Brunell can't/won't throw deep (save the very rare attempt).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|