Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2006, 07:57 PM   #91
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: It's Not Just Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sociofan View Post
I'm sorry. And your unique contribution to team improvement insight is...?
i started with it. i totally wouldn't put it past Gibbs to stay with Brunell with next week, if so, i IMPLORE him to start giving Campbell first team practice regularly at the very least. if not just all the snaps on gameday.

i would fire Jerry Gray in the offseason, the DB position has gone nothing but down in every category.

I'd put Rocky in and have him learn also, maybe experiment with a 3-4 with Carter as an LB, maybe even Arch. who knows, anything.

my point is, and has always been, that most of these problems can't be fixed now. at least the QB position can.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-12-2006, 08:07 PM   #92
Sammy Baugh Fan
Playmaker
 
Sammy Baugh Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 63
Posts: 2,507
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Mark can't even go deep in bed" - Mrs Brunell

If at best you can say Mark swallows after he sucks. I had an Ex-wife thatdid the same.




EDIT:taht to that
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star.
Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks
Sammy Baugh Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 08:14 PM   #93
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

The defense was bad, but Brunell gave us absolutely NO chance to win. He led us to 3 points and gave the Eagles 7 with his terrible INT for a touchdown. Gibbs' decision to start Brunell this season is the No. 1 reason we're moving backward and will finish with a losing record.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 08:16 PM   #94
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilbert07 View Post
The defense was bad, but Brunell gave us absolutely NO chance to win. He led us to 3 points and gave the Eagles 7 with his terrible INT for a touchdown. Gibbs' decision to start Brunell this season is the No. 1 reason we're moving backward and will finish with a losing record.
Actually, Brunell gave us -4 points (FG-INT=-4).
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 08:19 PM   #95
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Actually, Brunell gave us -4 points (FG-INT=-4).
True. He hurt us more than helped. Sadly, the prettiest pass of the day came from ARE, even though it was knocked away.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 08:58 PM   #96
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

I said this a couple weeks ago, but I will say it again. Brunell doesn't give us the best chance to win now. He isn't good. He stares down one receiver the entire play, then he either throws it to them or throws it away. He is basically a rookie out there. I get excited when he actually throws down the middle, steps up in the pocket, looks off a defender, pump fakes, or throws farther than 10 yards. You shouldn't have to worry about those things with a 15 year veteran. He just isn't a good quarterback anymore. His career is over.

Campbell needs to be put in now. That stuff I just said doesn't even really matter anymore because we have no chance at making the playoffs anyway unless we somehow win 7 in a row. There is absolutely no reason at all to leave Brunell in. Gibbs is an idiot if he does.

edit: If Brunell gave us the best chance to win, we wouldn't be 3-6. That is what we were when Gibbs benched him in '04. He didn't give us the best chance then, and he doesn't now either.
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 09:06 PM   #97
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

It will be an interesting week around Redskins Park. I hope Gibbs doesn't praise Brunell's performance again because it would be totally hollow. Brunell played a poor ball today, bottom line. Sadly enough, if we continue to play like we have been and finish 6-10 or 5-11, Gibbs Act 2 could have a similar winning (losing) percentage as Spurrier.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 09:19 PM   #98
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Seriously guys, I am really pissed off. I know he is our best chance of making the playoffs, and I would stick with Brunell but he is playing awful.

He only looks at Moss. It is really bad, if you look at Brunell, he only looks at MOss, and throws it to him, even in triple coverage.

I made a post earlier this week, saying I dont want Moss to play, bc this way it forces him to mix it up. If Moss is in, he only looks at him, therefore increasing our chance of losing.

Looks like I was right.

I am beyond pissed at our team, we dont even have a fucking pulse.
PLAYOFFS? he sucks. no future. dead skill set. he is horrible. We suck as a team.
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper.
- Churchill
BrunellMVP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 09:21 PM   #99
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunellMVP? View Post
PLAYOFFS? he sucks. no future. dead skill set. he is horrible. We suck as a team.
Isn't time for your to change your name?
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 10:36 PM   #100
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Did anyone see the brunell press conference after the game? It looked like he was about to cry.
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 10:39 PM   #101
chris36
Special Teams
 
chris36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

I hope that means, he knows he lost his job.
chris36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 10:41 PM   #102
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris36 View Post
I hope that means, he knows he lost his job.
Something we can actually agree on.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 10:45 PM   #103
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilbert07 View Post
True. He hurt us more than helped. Sadly, the prettiest pass of the day came from ARE, even though it was knocked away.
What about the pass to BL?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 11:39 PM   #104
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Brunell only looks at Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I don't think where he looks is the problem, he has hit Cooley and Lloyd. We have no downfield attack, and Saunders appears to be giving up on even trying to make something happen downfield with this super conservative playcalling.


His playcalling is the way it is because he knows Brunell cannot throw the ball acurately downfield on a consistent basis. He therefore stays with what he believes Brunell can do, which is limited. Much different than the offense we saw his team run in KC.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 11:42 PM   #105
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: Brunell only looks at Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
His playcalling is the way it is because he knows Brunell cannot throw the ball acurately downfield on a consistent basis. He therefore stays with what he believes Brunell can do, which is limited. Much different than the offense we saw his team run in KC.
I totally agree. Remember how Saunders was brought in because he was going to establish a vertical attack? Saunders said he was committed to establishing the deep threat, we got the receivers to make it happen, but Brunell can't/won't throw deep (save the very rare attempt).
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.00391 seconds with 10 queries