Brandon Marshall To DC?

TheBackupKicker · 04-13-2010, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpaint

Brandon Marshall just signed his tender FYI.

he has to sign his tender to be traded

44ever · 04-13-2010, 04:36 PM

:thumb:

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker

he has to sign his tender to be traded

johno · 04-13-2010, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker

he has to sign his tender to be traded

o rly?

Ruhskins · 04-13-2010, 04:41 PM

duetsch215 · 04-13-2010, 04:43 PM

a WR means nothing w/o an OL to protect the QB who delivers the pass to him. Just ask Calvin Johnson

Daseal · 04-13-2010, 05:00 PM

People act as if building a team is a purely linear type of progression. First you get all your OL, then all your RBs, then all your WR. They're trying to improve the team, and WR is a spot of great need. I realize OL has priority over WR -- but that doesn't mean we should ignore WR. Give Kyle the tools he needs, we certainly don't have anything even close to an Andre Johnson on this team now.

44ever · 04-13-2010, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

People act as if building a team is a purely linear type of progression. First you get all your OL, then all your RBs, then all your WR. They're trying to improve the team, and WR is a spot of great need. I realize OL has priority over WR -- but that doesn't mean we should ignore WR. Give Kyle the tools he needs, we certainly don't have anything even close to an Andre Johnson on this team now.

Im Right here!!! Hello?

Skinny Tee · 04-13-2010, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

People act as if building a team is a purely linear type of progression. First you get all your OL, then all your RBs, then all your WR. They're trying to improve the team, and WR is a spot of great need. I realize OL has priority over WR -- but that doesn't mean we should ignore WR. Give Kyle the tools he needs, we certainly don't have anything even close to an Andre Johnson on this team now.

How do you implement your offensive scheme without an OL though?

Get all the skill players you want they won't be able to be effective if the average time of your plays is less than 3 seconds due to hurries and pressure to your QB.

Teams need to walk before they can run. You need to see what you're good at first by giving your skill players room to operate. That's when your going to find out your offense's strengths and weaknesses and go about building your overall scheme.

Also, didn't we address our WR's already in the draft two years ago? That's just a plain careless waste of value to not even give these guys a chance in this new system.

Dirtbag59 · 04-13-2010, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker

just take a look at my sig

Your stats are still wrong for one year.

Quote:

B Marshall stats the last 3 seasons
2009- 101 catches 1120 yards
2008- 104 catches 1265 yards
2007- 102 catches 1120 yards

I personally find it hard to believe that he got the exact same amount of yards in two years.

TheBackupKicker · 04-13-2010, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Your stats are still wrong for one year.

I personally find it hard to believe that he got the exact same amount of yards in two years.

sorry he got 1365 in 2007 not 1120

Dirtbag59 · 04-13-2010, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker

sorry he got 1365 in 2007 not 1120

Ha ha, the ironic thing is you were underselling him. That 1,365 makes him look like a much better option. On the other hand his numbers do say that he is "regressing." And he does seem good for one suspension/benching per year.

TheBackupKicker · 04-13-2010, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johno

o rly?

he has to be under contract to be traded thats why he signed it just like JC

TheBackupKicker · 04-13-2010, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Ha ha, the ironic thing is you were underselling him. That 1,365 makes him look like a much better option. On the other hand his numbers do say that he is "regressing." And he does seem good for one suspension/benching per year.

regressing? haha u have to be joking

going from 1200 to 1100 isnt regressing he had 10 tds in 09 and 6 in 08 and hes only 26 and not to mention his QB went from cutler to orton!

Dirtbag59 · 04-13-2010, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker

regressing? haha u have to be joking

going from 1200 to 1100 isnt regressing he had 10 tds in 09 and 6 in 08 and hes only 26 and not to mention his QB went from cutler to orton!

Don't facepalm me. Certainly you saw the quotes around the word "regressing."

You know what, enough talk

TheBackupKicker · 04-13-2010, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Don't facepalm me. Certainly you saw the quotes around the word "regressing."

You know what, enough talk

04-13-2010, 04:41 PM	#94
Ruhskins Living Legend Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 22,378	Re: Brandon Marshall To DC? __________________ R.I.P. #21

04-13-2010, 04:43 PM	#95
duetsch215 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Richmond (School at ODU) Posts: 100	Re: Brandon Marshall To DC? a WR means nothing w/o an OL to protect the QB who delivers the pass to him. Just ask Calvin Johnson __________________ I'm a smart fella, and you're a fart smella

04-13-2010, 05:00 PM	#96
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 42 Posts: 8,341	Re: Brandon Marshall To DC? People act as if building a team is a purely linear type of progression. First you get all your OL, then all your RBs, then all your WR. They're trying to improve the team, and WR is a spot of great need. I realize OL has priority over WR -- but that doesn't mean we should ignore WR. Give Kyle the tools he needs, we certainly don't have anything even close to an Andre Johnson on this team now. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

Brandon Marshall To DC?

Locker Room Main Forum