Your final prediction for #10

[drew54]

If the Skins trade up, they will continue to prove how to use the draft to never win. These spread offense QBs are not worth the risk of trading up for.

Draft Cameron Jordon @ 10, or trade down and get 2nd tier QB or Ryan Kerrigan. Use extra picks for 3-4 style LB/DE while adding a few more picks to be used on DE/LB, CB, OL.

This team has many holes, and for once all positions of need should be filled with the draft first. Band aids can come later through free agency.

[skinsfaninok]

^ the redskins are taking a QB my man it's just a fact. Idk if it's going to be at 2, 5 , 10? Either way we r taking a QB

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by drew54

If the Skins trade up, they will continue to prove how to use the draft to never win. These spread offense QBs are not worth the risk of trading up for.

Draft Cameron Jordon @ 10, or trade down and get 2nd tier QB or Ryan Kerrigan. Use extra picks for 3-4 style LB/DE while adding a few more picks to be used on DE/LB, CB, OL.

This team has many holes, and for once all positions of need should be filled with the draft first. Band aids can come later through free agency.

I don't see how spread offense is an impediment. I think it's been proven that it's not.

But I'll tell you why I don't want Gabbert. Because the only Missouri QB who should ever grace a Redskins uniform is Chase Daniel!! His numbers in college crush Gabbert's. Still pissed we let him go. I may just sue.

If we don't give up our 2nd, which it appears we won't have to I'm not opposed to trading up for a QB. I just hope that QB is Locker, not Sunshine.

[skinsfaninok]

Lmao hey sunshine was a baller

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't see how spread offense is an impediment. I think it's been proven that it's not.

But I'll tell you why I don't want Gabbert. Because the only Missouri QB who should ever grace a Redskins uniform is Chase Daniel!! His numbers in college crush Gabbert's. Still pissed we let him go. I may just sue.

If we don't give up our 2nd, which it appears we won't have to I'm not opposed to trading up for a QB. I just hope that QB is Locker, not Sunshine.

So how do we trade up without giving up our #2 pick? Next year's picks?

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Lotus

So how do we trade up without giving up our #2 pick? Next year's picks?

Yes word is a 1st and a 3rd in 2012

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Yes word is a 1st and a 3rd in 2012

I've heard 1st and 4th, so there are certainly different options being thrown out

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Lotus

So how do we trade up without giving up our #2 pick? Next year's picks?

Yup.

I don't believe this is a smokescreen, but I also don't think we're going to trade up to get Gabbert. I think someone else will offer more, or the Broncos will just stay at #2 and choose from 3 great defensive options in Darreus, Miller, and Peterson.

I think, if we trade up, we may move up four or five spots for Locker. But that's just my opinion.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't see how spread offense is an impediment. I think it's been proven that it's not.

But I'll tell you why I don't want Gabbert. Because the only Missouri QB who should ever grace a Redskins uniform is Chase Daniel!! His numbers in college crush Gabbert's. Still pissed we let him go. I may just sue.

If we don't give up our 2nd, which it appears we won't have to I'm not opposed to trading up for a QB. I just hope that QB is Locker, not Sunshine.

Okay, I'll bite: whats the argument for Locker over Sunshine Gabbert?

[skinsfaninok]

@SS
A first and a forth sounds much better

As far as the QB I'm cool with either one (BG/JL)

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Okay, I'll bite: whats the argument for Locker over Sunshine Gabbert?

Argument for Locker over Gabbert: I'd say if the offense was being designed to suit Mikes version of the offense. With a heavy emphasis on play action and bootlegs. Also if you feel that Locker is the second coming of Steve Young and Gabbert is the second coming of....Carson Palmer then I'd say we'd be better off with Locker.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Argument for Locker over Gabbert: I'd say if the offense was being designed to suit Mikes version of the offense. With a heavy emphasis on play action and bootlegs. Also if you feel that Locker is the second coming of Steve Young and Gabbert is the second coming of....Carson Palmer then I'd say we'd be better off with Locker.

I don't think Locker is the next coming of Steve Young, exactly. But I see what you're saying.

I have no problem with Locker's play outside of the pocket. I just think Gabbert is better at that specific skill.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Okay, I'll bite: whats the argument for Locker over Sunshine Gabbert?

Because I said so. What more do you need to know?

See, this is why we're prepared to let you walk over to that Titans message board.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Okay, I'll bite: whats the argument for Locker over Sunshine Gabbert?

*Long Post*
I'll bite, but will I get a response?
I just had a similar discussion already in another thread.

When I look at Locker and Gabbert (after watching several games from each and charting 1 of each player's games) they're similar prospects except Locker is more athletic and more of a playmaker which is an important to trait to certain schools of thought.(see the sig)*

-Locker played under much more physical and mental duress week to week due to the talent disparity at Washington and his decision to return.


-Locker has performed under the pressure of essentially carrying a bad team.
For me knowing that Locker can handle those pressures and answer the bell when his team needs him most carries a lot of weight.

I'm not saying that Gabbert can't do what I talk about above but we know know that Locker can because we've seen it.
Gabbert has been skittish at times and who knows how he will respond to playing on a team that is very well.........limited in regards to talent?



Here's how I sum up Gabbert:
very clean efficient throwing motion (to my eye the best in the draft), consistent mechanics, quick release, good accuracy escpecially in the short to intermediate passing game, decent throwing on the run, good arm strength along with some athleticism those are the franchise tools he brings to the table you can build an offense around that skillset especially his throwing consistency.

Locker: good clean motion, quick release, needs to improve on consistency, good accuracy to all levels of the field, elite throwing on the run, near elite arm strength, elite athleticism.

Another plus is that Locker played 2 years in a pro-style offense that ran plays with the same concepts as the Denver/Houston WCO and he has more experience operating under center in a rhythm based 3-5-7 step drop offense, making line-calls, audibles, site adjustments and pre-snap reads.



Now to everyones favorite 'knock' against Locker accuracy or ball placement.

Here's my take:The teams that value/drafts Locker won't/don't think he has 'accuracy issues' beyond those legitamtely caused by the 0-12 talent around him, specifically up front along the OL.





Here's roughly how I grade this class, keep in mind the average at the end doesn't actually equal the grade because different categories carry different weights.

Originally Posted by 30gut

Updated 4/6/11



QB Eval-----Acc------- Arm------Ath/Esc------Drop/Foot-----Exp---Play------- Prod/Eff-------Size----Throw----AVG



Dalton........3.5...........3..........3.25....... ........3.............3.5...3.5...............4... .........3..........5.......3.53



Gabbert.......3...........4............3.......... ........3..............3........3..............3.. ..........5.........5........3.5


J.Johnson.....3...........3.............4......... .......3.5............3........4..............3... ..........4........2.5........3.3



Kaeprnick......3.........4.5...........4.......... .......2.5............3........4..............4... ..........4..........2........3.4



Locker..........3...........4.5...........4....... ..........4..............3.......5...............3 ............4..........5......3.94


Mallett..........4............5.............1..... ............5.............3.5.......1............. 4............4...........4......3.5



Newton........3............5.............4........ .........2.5............1.5.......5.............5. ...........5...........4......3.8



Ponder.........3............3...........3......... ........5..............4........3...............3. .........4.25......3.5.......3.52



Stanzi.........3.25..........3............3....... ..........5.............3.5.......3..............4 ...........4.5.......3......3.58



Ty Taylor........3............3............5......... .......3.5..............4........5.............4.. ..........2.........3......3.61

I think both QBs are scheme diverse.
I can see why Locker might be more tempting to Mike Shanahan because Elway himself said that Locker reminds him of well...himself.

But, as much as I like Locker and Gabbert as prospects I find it hard to believe that we should or need to trade up to No.2 to get them.

There are other good QB prospects in this draft and some good developmental prospects in the 3rd-4th rounds if we can't get a a tier 1 or 2 QB.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by 30gut

I'll bite, but will I get a response?
I just had a similar discussion already in another thread.

When I look at Locker and Gabbert (after watching several games from each and charting 1 of each player's games) they're similar prospects except Locker is more athletic and more of a playmaker which is an important to trait to certain schools of thought.(see the sig)*

-Locker played under much more physical and mental duress week to week due to the talent disparity at Washington and his decision to return.


-Locker has performed under the pressure of essentially carrying a bad team.
For me knowing that Locker can handle those pressures and answer the bell when his team needs him most carries a lot of weight.

I'm not saying that Gabbert can't do what I talk about above but we know know that Locker can because we've seen it.
Gabbert has been skittish at times and who knows how he will respond to playing on a team that is very well.........limited in regards to talent?



Here's how I sum up Gabbert:
very clean efficient throwing motion (to my eye the best in the draft), consistent mechanics, quick release, good accuracy escpecially in the short to intermediate passing game, decent throwing on the run, good arm strength along with some athleticism those are the franchise tools he brings to the table you can build an offense around that skillset especially his throwing consistency.

Locker: good clean motion, quick release, needs to improve on consistency, good accuracy to all levels of the field, elite throwing on the run, near elite arm strength, elite athleticism.

Another plus is that Locker played 2 years in a pro-style offense that ran plays with the same concepts as the Denver/Houston WCO and he has more experience operating under center in a rhythm based 3-5-7 step drop offense, making line-calls, audibles, site adjustments and pre-snap reads.



Now to everyones favorite 'knock' against Locker accuracy or ball placement.

Here's my take:The teams that value/drafts Locker won't/don't think he has 'accuracy issues' beyond those legitamtely caused by the 0-12 talent around him, specifically up front along the OL.





Here's roughly how I grade this class, keep in mind the average at the end doesn't actually equal the grade because different categories carry different weights.



I think both QBs are scheme diverse.
I can see why Locker might be more tempting to Mike Shanahan because Elway himself said that Locker reminds him of well...himself.

But, as much as I like Locker and Gabbert as prospects I find it hard to believe that we should or need to trade up to No.2 to get them.

There are other good QB prospects in this draft and some good developmental prospects in the 3rd-4th rounds if we can't get a a tier 1 or 2 QB.

If I can put your Locker argument in more objective terms, is it that: he's been starting for four years and through repetition we know that his mental and physical duress (specifically pass pressure) is more valuable because he's had to overcome more of it to be where he is. I certainly do not think Locker plays on a different level of mental and physical duress than Gabbert. That would draw a distinction where one does not exist. But he's been battling since 2007, which should not be overlooked.

I think you're right that we know what we're getting in Locker (character-wise). Ultimately, that's the knockout punch against him as a prospect (ability-wise), but it's still valuable to know that you're getting a good kid that has been through the worst of it in college and can handle the worst of what the NFL throws at him.

We're less certain of Gabbert as a prospect because we have seen less of him, I agree. But we also should be more certain that he can do it because Gabbert at his "worst" helped to build a 2010 season where Missou was in the Nat'l title picture for 2/3 of the regular season before taking a loss to OU, where as Locker at his best took a less than able team to roughly .500, and did most damage through individual key big plays against weaker competition whereas Gabbert was more consistent down to down and accomplished what he did not through highlights but through staying ahead of the opponent on first, second, and third down, the traits that will make him successful in the NFL.