2017 NFL draft rounds 4-7

[MTK]

Originally Posted by FlyerSkin

Nicholson should be seen strictly as depth. Guy has potential, but that isn't saying much since we have a glaring need at S. He grows a pair and gets more physical with his play, he will contribute. MSU defensively this past season was somewhat disappointing to say the least, and he was a part of that.

And special teams. These are the rounds where you look to fill out ST and hope for an eventual starter in the process.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by sevier2

I would have gladly taken Asiata(G), Brantley(DT) or King(DB) with my limited research. But hey i'm just a bartender what do I know.

Every other pick has me very excited, this one just seemed.... eh.

I agree. Boy, what a reach...I have to wonder if t gray maybe help eye this guy as a target. Maybe someone he scouted and admired a couple years ago.

Head scratcher overall. I was hoping for an interior Oline man there.

[vallin21]

Asiata is still there; also some decent NT's (Vincent Taylor, Stevie Tu'ikolovatu)

[FlyerSkin]

Originally Posted by sevier2

I would have gladly taken Asiata(G), Brantley(DT) or King(DB) with my limited research. But hey i'm just a bartender what do I know.

Every other pick has me very excited, this one just seemed.... eh.

Thing is all the really good safeties are gone. Nicholson does have a lot of potential, just has to unlock his inner beast. He is about the same as Swearinger. If he really puts the effort into it he can be a starter.

[FlyerSkin]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

I agree. Boy, what a reach...I have to wonder if t gray maybe help eye this guy as a target. Maybe someone he scouted and admired a couple years ago.

Head scratcher overall. I was hoping for an interior Oline man there.

Thing is we are not set at safety. Even with the acquisition of Swearinger, we really don't have a really good S. Cravens will probably pan out, but I am worried if he can stay on the field, thus is why I stated before he is for depth. Once Peppers and the other top safeties were picked, the FO did the best they could. I wouldn't get discouraged that much about this pick. He was a decent S, just didn't have a killer instinct.

[Skinsfanatic]

Jeremy Sprinkle

[vallin21]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

Jeremy Sprinkle

Solid pick. V. Davis can't play forever. PFF compared him to Julius Thomas.

[Skinsfanatic]

There goes Asiata.

[Alvin Walton]

Yes, solid pick.
We need a little TE depth.
Our draft class is now sprinkled with talent.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

Yes, solid pick.
We need a little TE depth.
Our draft class is now sprinkled with talent.

Solid pick again...lotta potential. Can block and catch the ball. Really a solid prospect...we killed it here

[WillH]

I think Sprinkle can potentially contribute in two TE sets in the Redzone immediately. He's a good blocker and a good receiver. He can contribute on Rushing and PA plays especially. He also lined up at Fullback a bit, so maybe he can also help Perine punch it in.

[los panda]

reed, davis, paul, carrier, and now sprinkle.

i guess sprinkle is the only blocker?

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by los panda

reed, davis, paul, carrier, and now sprinkle.

i guess sprinkle is the only blocker?

Paul or Carrier, or both maybe, are gone now.

[Chico23231]

Mike Mayock doesn’t hide his contempt for draft’s circus atmosphere | ProFootballTalk

lol apparently mayock bout had it with the show portion of the draft. Kinda would be cool to have him in the organization

[los panda]

i would snag kaaya if he's still there in the 6th. i would have said peterman or kaaya, but bills got peterman.

some form of interior o-lineman also in the 6th.