Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-25-2021, 10:15 AM   #61
nonniey
The Starter
 
nonniey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,431
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
We knew going into the year everything begins with the defense and it was a god awful shit show. So seeing that start to turn a bit around is a positive cause in order to get back to winning it starts there.

I don’t think anybody is satisfied with the team yesterday, plenty of mistakes to point out which cost us the game. But the team today was better than the team several weeks ago.

It’s really hard to win without a starting QB
So it was our QB that is the reason we lost 5 games?
nonniey is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-25-2021, 10:18 AM   #62
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,293
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonniey View Post
So it was our QB that is the reason we lost 5 games?
The only reason? No.

One of many reasons? Definitely.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:19 AM   #63
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Bro pointing out improvements in gameplay isnt a “narrative”…yes a loss is a loss. But astute fans of the Warpath brand know football and we can discern dumpfire from good football. Seeing the defense improve is what we have been waiting for…seeing the growth of Davis, the improve play of Collins since his reassignment is kinda what diehards do here.

Yes you are what your record says you are, but seeing better play is welcoming
I'd actually like to tone this particular point down a little bit. Yes this week he wasn't exposed on egregious blown coverage or ugly missed tackle, but he still made some very bad plays IMO, here are 2 of them:

__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:20 AM   #64
nonniey
The Starter
 
nonniey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,431
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
The last 2 weeks the offense has become the problem and the D has been mostly "good enough".
You mean the last 1 week right? Last week the D was ok in the 1st half and then as bad as they had been all year in the 2d half. Yesterday was the only game the defense has been ok -not great - but ok.
nonniey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:25 AM   #65
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 52
Posts: 22,908
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

I think we can all agree there is work to be done on both sides of the ball. No reason to try n figure out who is responsible for losing. Lol. It is the offense. It is the defense. It is the staff. We have yet to play a complete game on both sides of the ball.
punch it in is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:41 AM   #66
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,862
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrenchSkin View Post
I'd actually like to tone this particular point down a little bit. Yes this week he wasn't exposed on egregious blown coverage or ugly missed tackle, but he still made some very bad plays IMO, here are 2 of them:

He awful in space. He is back on his feet and not moving toward the player in his zone. He is slow to process
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:47 AM   #67
AnonEmouse
The Starter
 
AnonEmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 57
Posts: 2,191
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

I wonder if he's lacking confidence in a) himself, b) his body (injury already mentioned) or c) both? Seems hesitant more than anything, though yes he could be just slow.
AnonEmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:50 AM   #68
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,106
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Just cause Ron put Collins near the line and blitzed him doesn't cover up his weaknesses. He still will have to cover at some point and that is a lost cause. It's free money and an easy read for the QB when he has to cover. It's like Ron is trying to patch up a leaky faucet. Just cut your losses and release him. The tape doesn't lie. Collins is not good at football. If Collins wasn't making the money he is he'd be long gone.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:50 AM   #69
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,106
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
I wonder if he's lacking confidence in a) himself, b) his body (injury already mentioned) or c) both? Seems hesitant more than anything, though yes he could be just slow.
He was slow before he got hurt.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:53 AM   #70
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,106
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
You can move the offense all day but the only thing that matters is coming away with points, 23 points in the last 2 weeks is downright pathetic. I like TH as a backup but that's it.
I don't even want him as a backup. I want all my QB's to be able to push the ball down the field. He is too easy to defend.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:54 AM   #71
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,862
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Just cause Ron put Collins near the line and blitzed him doesn't cover up his weaknesses. He still will have to cover at some point and that is a lost cause. It's free money and an easy read for the QB when he has to cover. It's like Ron is trying to patch up a leaky faucet. Just cut your losses and release him. The tape doesn't lie. Collins is not good at football. If Collins wasn't making the money he is he'd be long gone.
Another Bruce Allen gift to us…
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 10:58 AM   #72
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,106
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

The thing is the defense is obviously where we were supposed to be strong. Not the offense. The d had expectations. They are almost the worst in the league. Even more disturbing is they are an absolute train wreck shit show on 3rd down. That is truly the sign of a bad defense- when you can not get off the field on 3rd down. If they play a so so game that is like a moral victory. SMH.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 11:01 AM   #73
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,106
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Another Bruce Allen gift to us…
But Ron has no loyalty to him so just move on. He had no problem cutting Haskins. It is so obvious to the eye that the other guys are better- meaning they can at least tackle, are better athletes and aren't as slow. I don't get it.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 11:02 AM   #74
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,862
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

I’d say one thing, Jon Allen is having a All-Pro year

Jamin Davis is improving

This front four is not the problem, Holcomb and Davis don’t seem to be the problem either.

Curl is a keeper, St Juice looks to have a future. Danny Johnson wasn’t bad yesterday
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 11:03 AM   #75
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,862
Re: WFT v. Packers Good Loss post-game

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
But Ron has no loyalty to him so just move on. He had no problem cutting Haskins. It is so obvious to the eye that the other guys are better- meaning they can at least tackle, are better athletes and aren't as slow. I don't get it.
It’s not gonna happen this season but it better happen this off-season
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.15513 seconds with 10 queries