Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


"Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2010, 04:22 PM   #1
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,993
"Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

"Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block | ProFootballTalk.com

C.Johnson won't be traded for sure, but what about Frank Gore? Anyone think this could be another blockbuster trade? I say D.Williams is gone in Car
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-10-2010, 04:25 PM   #2
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,261
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

This could probably fit in the offseason rumor thread.

We already have 3 pro-bowl runningbacks so I doubt we are looking for another. It could very well be CP on the block.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 04:32 PM   #3
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,993
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Damn I didn't even think about the offseason thread lol
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 06:01 PM   #4
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

CP wouldn't qualify as a blockbuster deal. No franchise is giving up much for him because of 1) age 2) contract 3) it PORTIS.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 09:19 PM   #5
Kindoy
The Starter
 
Kindoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 1,013
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
CP wouldn't qualify as a blockbuster deal. No franchise is giving up much for him because of 1) age 2) contract 3) it PORTIS.

he's not that old.
__________________
RIP 21
Kindoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 09:25 PM   #6
duetsch215
Special Teams
 
duetsch215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Richmond (School at ODU)
Posts: 100
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

my guess is it's either Portis or Lynch because there are new coaches at those teams. It could be Williams in CAR also because they don't have many draft picks and John Fox seems to be on the hot seat
__________________
I'm a smart fella, and you're a fart smella
duetsch215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 10:48 PM   #7
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

I would assume the guy from the pat or delangelo williams. I know there was a rumor after the season ended that Deangelo wasn't going to be back to CAr and they wanted to trade him.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 12:10 AM   #8
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,261
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
I would assume the guy from the pat or delangelo williams. I know there was a rumor after the season ended that Deangelo wasn't going to be back to CAr and they wanted to trade him.
I think you may be right. Jonathan Stewart is still busting off 50 yard runs in the Meadowlands...

Deangelo has talent and will help out whatever team he ends up with.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:59 AM   #9
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Lynch is definitely on the trading block. Would be surprised to see him still a Bill by April 30

CP, Ronnie Brown, and Laurence Maroney could all also be gone for the right price but I don't believe they're actively on the trade block
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 10:30 AM   #10
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

i dont see why anyone would give up anything for portis or maroney. they're both obviously on the decline and running backs are a dime a dozen.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:36 AM   #11
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 44
Posts: 17,460
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

It's Lynch.

Ronnie Brown MAYBE...but doubtful. DeAngelo Williams maybe while he's still worth something.

If we consider Willis McGahee a PB RB, he'll be moved most likely, Ray Rice is their man now.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 12:18 PM   #12
SolidSnake84
Playmaker
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,947
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Who would trade for Portis. What franchise is that desperate? The Raiders? He's got nothing left, so i know it isnt him...
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 12:24 PM   #13
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 44
Posts: 17,460
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidSnake84 View Post
Who would trade for Portis. What franchise is that desperate? The Raiders? He's got nothing left, so i know it isnt him...
You're right. Look at Marion Barber...only 26 but beaten down like Portis, yet is in a RRBC now and they can't get more than a 5th for him. They just extended him because they can't trade him.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 12:31 PM   #14
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,921
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

No more free agent RBs...lets focus on O-line
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 11:20 PM   #15
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,419
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
i dont see why anyone would give up anything for portis or maroney. they're both obviously on the decline and running backs are a dime a dozen.
Unlike Portis, Maroney has very low mileage. He has had nagging injuries his first 3 years in the league, so he is a risk, but Maroney has far fewer carries than Portis had at a similar stage in his career.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.14187 seconds with 10 queries