Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Ryan Kerrigan Appreciation thread.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2020, 08:55 AM   #31
AnonEmouse
The Starter
 
AnonEmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 57
Posts: 2,191
Re: Ryan Kerrigan Appreciation thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
RK deserves to play for a contender
Hard to argue with that, but given the different scenario to TW we should play hardball. We don't have a glaring need to trade him and get some kind of value back (although he is UFA next year), and if SF come calling their need is far greater. The reverse of the TW trade; they want a pro bowl capable player, they have to at least come close to a pro bowl level offer.

Q presumably we'd value picks over a player swap (or combo). Would you go for a package of lower picks or try to get a single higher (rd 2?) pick?
AnonEmouse is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-22-2020, 09:09 AM   #32
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,969
Re: Ryan Kerrigan Appreciation thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
Hard to argue with that, but given the different scenario to TW we should play hardball. We don't have a glaring need to trade him and get some kind of value back (although he is UFA next year), and if SF come calling their need is far greater. The reverse of the TW trade; they want a pro bowl capable player, they have to at least come close to a pro bowl level offer.

Q presumably we'd value picks over a player swap (or combo). Would you go for a package of lower picks or try to get a single higher (rd 2?) pick?
We would def need to get a OL in return but I don't see them doing that deal. Plus if we beat CLE Sunday 2-1 is a solid start. I'm not ready to write them off just yet
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2020, 09:26 AM   #33
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Ryan Kerrigan Appreciation thread.

They have 4 pretty good TE’s one being the one they drafted that Cooley liked.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2020, 09:39 AM   #34
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 35,969
Re: Ryan Kerrigan Appreciation thread.

I think Thomas has been solid actually.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2020, 12:22 PM   #35
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 40
Posts: 19,260
Re: Ryan Kerrigan Appreciation thread.

Kerrigan has stated numerous times he wants to finish his career here. And he fills a role on this team and Chase loves him. He is not getting traded this year.
__________________
Turkish: What's happening with them sausages, Charlie?
Sausage Charlie: Five minutes, Turkish.
Turkish: It was two minutes five minutes ago.
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.92685 seconds with 12 queries