Four Five Six Seven

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Schneed GTFO with your Reed and Jarrett comparison, not close...bottomline. Try to enjoy the rest of your day

I understand you're a talker and not much of a thinker, so let me do the thinking for you.

Jarrett - NFL.com scouting report bottom line:
Productive, yet limited, three-year starter with a nose for the ball and a willingness to play a physical brand of football. He can be a liability in coverage and will have to be covered up by scheme, but he's an absolute bulldog around the line of scrimmage and can play on special teams right away

So does that sound familiar?

You seem to love to compare combine stats as if that has any bearing on how a player plays in the NFL. Jarrett ran a 4.5, Reed a 4.6. Reed was 6 feet, Jarrett 5'10. Do you really think any of that matters? If so you're not knowledgeable enough to stay here and have Redskins Discussion for the Knowledgeable Fan.

Both sound tacklers, both strong special teamers, both understand how to be around the ball. Neither major playmaking forces in the passing game, both present coverage liabilities. Both very high effort guys, smart, respected in the locker room, but ultimately have a low ceiling because of athletic limitations.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I understand you're a talker and not much of a thinker, so let me do the thinking for you.

Jarrett - NFL.com scouting report bottom line:
Productive, yet limited, three-year starter with a nose for the ball and a willingness to play a physical brand of football. He can be a liability in coverage and will have to be covered up by scheme, but he's an absolute bulldog around the line of scrimmage and can play on special teams right away

So does that sound familiar?

You seem to love to compare combine stats as if that has any bearing on how a player plays in the NFL. Jarrett ran a 4.5, Reed a 4.6. Reed was 6 feet, Jarrett 5'10. Do you really think any of that matters? If so you're not knowledgeable enough to stay here and have Redskins Discussion for the Knowledgeable Fan.

Both sound tacklers, both strong special teamers, both understand how to be around the ball. Neither major playmaking forces in the passing game, both present coverage liabilities. Both very high effort guys, smart, respected in the locker room, but ultimately have a low ceiling because of athletic limitations.

Have you ever seen Jarrett play? GTFO then

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Have you ever seen Jarrett play? GTFO then

Yes, believe it or not you can see VT games up here in PA. So can I stay?

You love to spew posts all over this site but rarely put much cogent thought into it. Try adding value through quality instead of quantity.

[Bucket]

Calm down ladies.

You really cant compare a college kid to a 10 year vet. That being said, I dont see KJ as a long time solution just yet, but who knows. Lots of things change for players when they transition to NFL. Schemes, Speed, Growth.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Calm down ladies.

You really cant compare a college kid to a 10 year vet. That being said, I dont see KJ as a long time solution just yet, but who knows. Lots of things change for players when they transition to NFL. Schemes, Speed, Growth.

10 year vet... you think Reed would have ever played on a different team? I have serious doubts

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Yes, believe it or not you can see VT games up here in PA. So can I stay?

You love to spew posts all over this site but rarely put much cogent thought into it. Try adding value through quality instead of quantity.

Yeah, just a difference of opinion which Im good with, but I guess your not. But nothing really in Jarrett's play says Reed. But like I stated originally, scheme of tech's defense could have something to do with that. I actually think Jarrett could play slot CB in the nickel. As you know, Jarrett is a defensive player who is fun to watch, I think that is probably another difference with Reed.