|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-18-2010, 08:21 PM | #16 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
I have a curiosity about the play where Carlos missed on the interception. It would appear from the replay that Carlos actually caught the ball and his off-balance momentum carried him to the ground on his backside. When he hit the ground the ball came lose and the ruling on the field was incomplete, because the rule states the player must maintain possession throughout the process, even after hitting the ground.
Now this is what I'm curious about: The Colts challenged the play saying that Rogers caught the ball and the play should have been ruled an interception and fumble, recoverered by the Colts. Had the official actually reversed the ruling on the field and found that Rogers did indeed catch the ball and fumbled it after hitting the ground, then the results of the Colts challenge would have presented an interesting dilema. The ruling is, the ground can't cause a fumble. When Carlos went to the ground he wasn't down by contact. I'm curious about what would have been the outcome of the challenge had the replay official actually agreed with the Colts initial contention that Rogers caught the ball and then fumbled it.....A challenge by the Colts that would have actually worked to the benefit of the Redskins?
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
Advertisements |
10-18-2010, 08:46 PM | #17 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 56
Posts: 21,130
|
Since they can follow the play through the fumble and see if possession is clear then they could have ruled INT fumble and recovery by Indianapolis. I was sure that was going to be the ruling and thus even when Los got an INT we still got nada. Fortunately he did not hold on.
|
10-18-2010, 11:28 PM | #18 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
I've been counting this season, and after 6 games, Rogers has dropped 5 INTs where he had his hands on the ball, two of which would have iced victories. Dude would be great if he could catch even 50% of his chances.
|
10-18-2010, 11:36 PM | #19 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
Quote:
|
|
10-18-2010, 11:39 PM | #20 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 37
Posts: 16,866
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
I'm pretty sure I read on here somewhere that someone said the coaches say that Rogers catches everything in practice, its just on Sundays his hands blow.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
10-18-2010, 11:46 PM | #21 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,197
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
Someone tell his hands that it is Tuesday or Wednesday.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
10-18-2010, 11:48 PM | #22 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
As long as we don't EVER pay him much Los is a keeper. For all practical purposes he has exactly zero playmaking ability, and when his skill sets tapers off just a tad from age he'll be almost useless. Sooo if a franchise is willing to throw money at him...let's give him a round of silent applause lol.
...extend him on the cheap and upgrade FS
__________________
24-34 |
10-19-2010, 12:28 AM | #23 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
Quote:
|
|
10-19-2010, 03:05 AM | #24 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 683
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
I believe he catches everything in practice. I think its in his head too much on sundays when considering all the previous drops, and he just thinks about it too much.
__________________
never another.....R.I.P. Sean T #21 |
10-19-2010, 10:36 AM | #25 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 44
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
Carlos deserves those for each of the picks he dropped last game.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
10-19-2010, 11:22 AM | #26 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 59
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
I have a hard time believing he catches everything in practice.
|
10-19-2010, 11:39 AM | #27 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,293
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
Quote:
|
|
10-19-2010, 12:40 PM | #28 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 59
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
I'd have to see it with my own two eyes. Cause the boy couldn't catch a damn football during a game if his life depended on it.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
10-19-2010, 12:41 PM | #29 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
Correct.
Although I will say that was the longest timed drop of an INT I have ever witnessed.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
10-19-2010, 01:41 PM | #30 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: #22 Rogers!
This thread lacks a real issue.
Therefore, I suggest that the problem is not Rogers' hands, the problem is the shape of the ball. The NFL needs to adopt a round ball like in volleyball. Discuss.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|