Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Offense eager for tests

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2009, 04:48 AM   #1
stu_nna
Special Teams
 
stu_nna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Age: 46
Posts: 239
Offense eager for tests

Offense eager for tests - NFL News - FOX Sports on MSN-
stu_nna is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-15-2009, 08:13 AM   #2
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: Offense eager for tests

Glad to hear Scott Burley only had strained quads -- it looked like something with the knee at first and I thought his career was over before it began.

I'm really not worried at all about the D giving up 500 yards, most of those yards were from the 3rd and 4th string. While the starters gave up some yardage to the Ravens starters, we held them to field goals both times.

I'm absolutely confident our D is going to be freaky-nasty this year.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 08:19 AM   #3
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 62
Posts: 10,672
Re: Offense eager for tests

well, so far they failed the " first" test
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 09:07 AM   #4
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Offense eager for tests

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
well, so far they failed the " first" test
But wait. They couldn't get into a "rhythm". 10 plays aren't enough. Guess that means we won't be seeing any TDs on opening drives this year. Sheesh. Does everything have to be absolutely perfect for these guys?
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 09:12 AM   #5
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 62
Posts: 10,672
Re: Offense eager for tests

i agree with you. i wonder why so little playing time?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 09:48 AM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Offense eager for tests

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
i agree with you. i wonder why so little playing time?
Fear of expectations. It's an organization wide issue.

We can't play Campbell/Samuels/Cooley/Fletch more than a few plays because we can't risk them getting hurt. When you function as a marginal team, you literally need to squeeze every play out of the talent you have. Unfortunately, we're really the only example of a team in the league that consistently performs like a marginal contender, but expects to perform like a great team (although Dallas, if they don't fit the bill, is darn close).

If nothing else, the Campbell saga from March proves that we're not going to objectively evaluate where we are as a team in order to make the best move. We're not going to do that. We're going to set a bar at a goal, potentially unrealistic, and if the team fails to achieve that goal, we're going to fire everyone involved.

So instead of playing all of our players for a reasonable amount of time and not worrying about the injury risk (because after all, an injury risk in the preseason is an injury risk in the regular season), we're just going to get them out of there to protect them.

I don't share this philosophy, but if I'm in Zorn's shoes, I'd have to do the same thing to protect my own ass.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 10:13 AM   #7
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,284
Re: Offense eager for tests

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
We can't play Campbell/Samuels/Cooley/Fletch more than a few plays because we can't risk them getting hurt. When you function as a marginal team, you literally need to squeeze every play out of the talent you have. Unfortunately, we're really the only example of a team in the league that consistently performs like a marginal contender, but expects to perform like a great team.
That is the plain truth.

I don't know if we're the only team whose players have such an inflated sense of their true abilities, but ours surely do. It particularly annoys me when we lose to teams on our own level (mediocre) or even teams that are worse than ours and the players act like they weren't able to get up for playing a supposedly inferior opponent. And we often lose to these types of teams at home, too!

If any group needs alot of reps against outside opponents it's our offense. They just didn't get the job done last season.
KI Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 03:02 AM   #8
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 12,514
Re: Offense eager for tests

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
But wait. They couldn't get into a "rhythm". 10 plays aren't enough. Guess that means we won't be seeing any TDs on opening drives this year. Sheesh. Does everything have to be absolutely perfect for these guys?
We always make these excuses like our team is the only one that has adversity lol
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.08138 seconds with 10 queries