Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Ruhskins · 06-21-2011, 02:21 PM

This is excellent news (from Schefter's FB Page):

"Adam Schefter
More at ESPN: If and when agreement is reached, all players with 4, 5 and 6 years of service are expected to be unrestricted free agents."

firstdown · 06-21-2011, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

He's not tied to it in the way you're referring other than by the fact that it is relatively new for a stadium. It's only now getting into it's middle age period.

And the thing that is keeping him in the stadium more than anything is the implosion in the real estate market (since cities have figured out that stadiums are not the revenue generators they are made out to be). That land is worth a mint 10 years ago. Enough to build him a new stadium. Now...not so much.

Not all stadiums generate revenue but I'm FedEx brings in pretty good money for the 8 to 10 games palyed there. You to remember all the taxes raised off food, rooms, beer, etc... for 90,000 people. Also that land 10 yrs back was in the middle of the shit and I'd say its worth allot more today then back when the stadium was built.

over the mountain · 06-21-2011, 03:15 PM

48% sounds good to me. Im guessin they are going to agree to something in this ballpark so why not make it happen in the next few weeks instead of fighting for the next few months over a percent or 2.

hooskins · 06-21-2011, 03:52 PM

1-2 percent would be hundreds of thousands of dollars, right?

FRPLG · 06-21-2011, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by firstdown

Not all stadiums generate revenue but I'm FedEx brings in pretty good money for the 8 to 10 games palyed there. You to remember all the taxes raised off food, rooms, beer, etc... for 90,000 people. Also that land 10 yrs back was in the middle of the shit and I'd say its worth allot more today then back when the stadium was built.

What matters is how much it is worth today. He'd need the cash from it to fund building a new stadium. If he can't sell it for enough then he'll have to find other sources of funding. And the point is that cities aren't chomping at the bit to throw a bunch of money towards stadium construction/"urban renewal" projects since the revenue generated by the "renewal" has shown to be far less than expected in many cases around the country.

FRPLG · 06-21-2011, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hooskins

1-2 percent would be hundreds of thousands of dollars, right?

You mean millions right? Fighting for 90-180 MILLION is probably worth it to both sides.

FrenchSkin · 06-21-2011, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

You mean millions right? Fighting for 90-180 MILLION is probably worth it to both sides.

Is the bottle 48% full or 2% empty?

over the mountain · 06-21-2011, 04:20 PM

If its 9 bil, 1% is 9 mil dollars. (i hope, geez that BA in accounting was worth it)

If the league makes a profit of 18 bil (or was it 16 bil in the article?) in 2016, youre talking 18 mil per percent point.

Yeah 9 to 18 mil is alot in a vacuum of perspective, but consider the total dollar amounts, both parties have to lose alil to gain alil imo.

MTK · 06-21-2011, 04:24 PM

Good way for the league to generate more $$

NFL proposal reportedly features 16-game Thursday night schedule - chicagotribune.com

FrenchSkin · 06-21-2011, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by over the mountain

If its 9 bil, 1% is 9 mil dollars. (i hope, geez that BA in accounting was worth it)

If the league makes a profit of 18 bil (or was it 16 bil in the article?) in 2016, youre talking 18 mil per percent point.

Yeah 9 to 18 mil is alot in a vacuum of perspective, but consider the total dollar amounts, both parties have to lose alil to gain alil imo.

1% of 9 billion is 90 million. But your point is good.

Dirtbag59 · 06-21-2011, 05:43 PM

Guys breaking news. I'm so glad I'm the first one to post this
Lockout: Sources reveal details of proposed NFL CBA - ESPN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

This is excellent news (from Schefter's FB Page):

"Adam Schefter
More at ESPN: If and when agreement is reached, all players with 4, 5 and 6 years of service are expected to be unrestricted free agents."

Local tailors are going to need a lot of cloth to introduce this years free agent class. C Jenkins, A Franklin, D Joesph. How sweet it is.

SmootSmack · 06-21-2011, 05:57 PM

What would we do without you Dirt

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 06-21-2011, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

What would we do without you Dirt

Probably be a lot better off.

Dirtbag59 · 06-21-2011, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Probably be a lot better off.

I agree...wait what?

Lotus · 06-21-2011, 07:04 PM

Dirtbag has surpassed 10,000 posts. Time for a party.

06-21-2011, 02:21 PM	#46
Ruhskins Living Legend Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 22,208	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal This is excellent news (from Schefter's FB Page): "Adam Schefter More at ESPN: If and when agreement is reached, all players with 4, 5 and 6 years of service are expected to be unrestricted free agents." __________________ R.I.P. #21

06-21-2011, 03:15 PM	#48
over the mountain Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: close to the edge Posts: 4,926	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal 48% sounds good to me. Im guessin they are going to agree to something in this ballpark so why not make it happen in the next few weeks instead of fighting for the next few months over a percent or 2. __________________ Life is brutal, but beautiful

06-21-2011, 03:52 PM	#49
hooskins Most Interesting Man in the World Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Chantilly, VA Age: 36 Posts: 8,606	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal 1-2 percent would be hundreds of thousands of dollars, right? __________________ Vacancy

06-21-2011, 04:20 PM	#53
over the mountain Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: close to the edge Posts: 4,926	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal If its 9 bil, 1% is 9 mil dollars. (i hope, geez that BA in accounting was worth it) If the league makes a profit of 18 bil (or was it 16 bil in the article?) in 2016, youre talking 18 mil per percent point. Yeah 9 to 18 mil is alot in a vacuum of perspective, but consider the total dollar amounts, both parties have to lose alil to gain alil imo. __________________ Life is brutal, but beautiful

06-21-2011, 04:24 PM	#54
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 51 Posts: 99,332	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal Good way for the league to generate more $$ NFL proposal reportedly features 16-game Thursday night schedule - chicagotribune.com __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

06-21-2011, 05:57 PM	#57
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal What would we do without you Dirt __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

06-21-2011, 07:04 PM	#60
Lotus Fire Bruce NOW Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 11,434	Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal Dirtbag has surpassed 10,000 posts. Time for a party. __________________ Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny

Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Locker Room Main Forum