#1 Wide Receiver

GoSkins! · 10-17-2005, 10:51 PM

There are a few negatives from the last few games, but there is a glaring positive. We have a #1 wide receiver.

The WR's of this year are like the D-line of last year. Lights out. Moss is top shelf, Patten is fast enough to keep teams from diverting all of thier attention to Moss, Cooley is on pace for 800 yards, Thrash is clutch, and Jacobs could still break out.

Here is a chance for the doubters out there, the guys who screamed when we traded Coles, the guys who cryed when we passed on the WR's in the draft, to stand up and reassess thier position.

I thought we would be fine at WR and said so. I still never would have dreamed we would have the #1 WR in the NFL at this point.

BigSKINBauer · 10-17-2005, 10:57 PM

what the hail are you talking about, we have a "BUNCH OF NUMBER TWOS" remember. Moss is to short but Antonio brown is gonna be great-----ahhh those were the days-------i am guilty of some of this too, we should have drafted mike williams remember. "no true number 1"

Man right now i feel like we have a number 1(the best number 1 at that) and 2 number 2s. Patten hasn't done what i hoped but thrash has done a good job. Thrash is our second best receiver

Redskins8588 · 10-17-2005, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

Thrash is our second best receiver

What are you talking about?

According to some on here Thrash was a wast and should be cut because his special teams play wont make up for his poor WR play.

I agree, our receivers are really good, maybe, just maybe that is one of the many reasons MB looked so bad last year? Just a thought...

itvnetop · 10-17-2005, 11:41 PM

yeah, moss has definitely made me a believer... i thought we were crazy for not getting BMW.

saskin · 10-18-2005, 12:29 AM

Moss is plain awesome. I was watching the Dallas game, and in all his catches (this season), there's total concentration and poise. This last game in KC, I had my doubts that he'd pick up a lot of yardage but he broke away...for 72 yards. I have a feeling Patten will develop as we progress. Cooley is a dependable target and hard to bring down. Thrash is clutch and can pick up some good yards. All in all, I'm pleased with the recieving corps.

EternalEnigma21 · 10-18-2005, 12:40 AM

Moss currently leads all recievers in the league in yardage with 631yds. He's got about 40 yards on Steve Smith (even though smith has cought like 7 TDs) Whens the last time that happened. Hell he's tracking some nutty numbers, and he's over 19 yards a catch.

Coles by the way, has 289, avg. 11ypc and has 1TD. Well worth the nine mil.

gibbsisgod · 10-18-2005, 08:16 AM

Every Time Moss Touches The Ball I Get Excited. Its Really Nice To Finally Have A Playmaker Back In Washington. When He Gets The Ball You Get The Feeling That He Could Take Every Catch To The House

Defensewins · 10-18-2005, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoSkins!

..... and Jacobs could still break out.

Who???

Oh him....break is about it, not break out.

HailSkins81 · 10-18-2005, 08:41 AM

Looks like Holt is ahead by 7 yards, now. But Holt, like most others in the top 10 has 6 games, Moss has only had 5 games to do more than those with 6.

Schneed10 · 10-18-2005, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

Every Time Moss Touches The Ball I Get Excited. Its Really Nice To Finally Have A Playmaker Back In Washington. When He Gets The Ball You Get The Feeling That He Could Take Every Catch To The House

Why Do You Capitalize Every Single Word?

Schneed10 · 10-18-2005, 08:43 AM

Drafting Mike Williams always was a bad idea from the start, given the fact that we lost Smoot. That is definitely being proven now. If anything, we needed 2 CBs, not just the one we got in Rogers.

gibbsisgod · 10-18-2005, 09:01 AM

sorry

56FAN · 10-18-2005, 09:12 AM

Mike williams is bifg and sloooooooooooow, good target in the redzone.we needed cb and d line help, but cb mostly becuse of the age of harris and springs. now we need some lb's and d line and possibly o line. and another viable wr and running back and te that can stretch the field would be great. you guys think the pats would part with watson?

Dirtbag · 10-19-2005, 12:25 AM

I fucking need to get myself a Santana Moss jersey is about all I know. The man is insanely talented. How long do we have him under contract?

ST21 · 10-19-2005, 12:47 AM

not long enough

10-17-2005, 10:57 PM	#2
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 36 Posts: 5,688	Re: #1 Wide Receiver what the hail are you talking about, we have a "BUNCH OF NUMBER TWOS" remember. Moss is to short but Antonio brown is gonna be great-----ahhh those were the days-------i am guilty of some of this too, we should have drafted mike williams remember. "no true number 1" Man right now i feel like we have a number 1(the best number 1 at that) and 2 number 2s. Patten hasn't done what i hoped but thrash has done a good job. Thrash is our second best receiver Last edited by BigSKINBauer; 10-17-2005 at 11:20 PM.

10-17-2005, 11:41 PM	#4
itvnetop Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA Age: 47 Posts: 3,007	Re: #1 Wide Receiver yeah, moss has definitely made me a believer... i thought we were crazy for not getting BMW.

10-18-2005, 12:29 AM	#5
saskin Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: San Antonio Age: 36 Posts: 355	Re: #1 Wide Receiver Moss is plain awesome. I was watching the Dallas game, and in all his catches (this season), there's total concentration and poise. This last game in KC, I had my doubts that he'd pick up a lot of yardage but he broke away...for 72 yards. I have a feeling Patten will develop as we progress. Cooley is a dependable target and hard to bring down. Thrash is clutch and can pick up some good yards. All in all, I'm pleased with the recieving corps.

10-18-2005, 12:40 AM	#6
EternalEnigma21 Assistant Regional Mod Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Carbondale CO Age: 44 Posts: 2,958	Re: #1 Wide Receiver Moss currently leads all recievers in the league in yardage with 631yds. He's got about 40 yards on Steve Smith (even though smith has cought like 7 TDs) Whens the last time that happened. Hell he's tracking some nutty numbers, and he's over 19 yards a catch. Coles by the way, has 289, avg. 11ypc and has 1TD. Well worth the nine mil.

10-18-2005, 08:16 AM	#7
gibbsisgod Playmaker Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: 129 W 81st street Age: 44 Posts: 3,503	Re: #1 Wide Receiver Every Time Moss Touches The Ball I Get Excited. Its Really Nice To Finally Have A Playmaker Back In Washington. When He Gets The Ball You Get The Feeling That He Could Take Every Catch To The House

10-17-2005, 10:51 PM	#1
GoSkins! The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 54 Posts: 1,587	#1 Wide Receiver There are a few negatives from the last few games, but there is a glaring positive. We have a #1 wide receiver. The WR's of this year are like the D-line of last year. Lights out. Moss is top shelf, Patten is fast enough to keep teams from diverting all of thier attention to Moss, Cooley is on pace for 800 yards, Thrash is clutch, and Jacobs could still break out. Here is a chance for the doubters out there, the guys who screamed when we traded Coles, the guys who cryed when we passed on the WR's in the draft, to stand up and reassess thier position. I thought we would be fine at WR and said so. I still never would have dreamed we would have the #1 WR in the NFL at this point. __________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien

10-18-2005, 08:41 AM	#9
HailSkins81 Camp Scrub Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 32	Re: #1 Wide Receiver Looks like Holt is ahead by 7 yards, now. But Holt, like most others in the top 10 has 6 games, Moss has only had 5 games to do more than those with 6.

10-18-2005, 08:43 AM	#11
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 44 Posts: 12,416	Re: #1 Wide Receiver Drafting Mike Williams always was a bad idea from the start, given the fact that we lost Smoot. That is definitely being proven now. If anything, we needed 2 CBs, not just the one we got in Rogers.

10-18-2005, 09:01 AM	#12
gibbsisgod Playmaker Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: 129 W 81st street Age: 44 Posts: 3,503	Re: #1 Wide Receiver sorry

10-18-2005, 09:12 AM	#13
56FAN Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: MANASSAS VA Age: 61 Posts: 323	Re: #1 Wide Receiver Mike williams is bifg and sloooooooooooow, good target in the redzone.we needed cb and d line help, but cb mostly becuse of the age of harris and springs. now we need some lb's and d line and possibly o line. and another viable wr and running back and te that can stretch the field would be great. you guys think the pats would part with watson?

10-19-2005, 12:25 AM	#14
Dirtbag Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 142	Re: #1 Wide Receiver I fucking need to get myself a Santana Moss jersey is about all I know. The man is insanely talented. How long do we have him under contract?

10-19-2005, 12:47 AM	#15
ST21 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Texas Posts: 519	Re: #1 Wide Receiver not long enough __________________ SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........

#1 Wide Receiver

Locker Room Main Forum