10-21-2005, 06:18 PM | #61 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
Advertisements |
10-21-2005, 06:34 PM | #62 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
thats funny.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
10-21-2005, 07:42 PM | #63 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,495
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
First, no that doesn't necessarily mean 4 DCs are better, there's different amounts of luck/talent/money in each of those top 5 defenses, but being in the top 5 two years running means you're pretty good. I never said anything like lavar was a criminal or a rookie who couldn't play, and i think the majority of people here thought the same. Its just that GW's opinion takes precedence over lavar's opinion for most people, and that's that. I'd like to hear all of GW's excuses, he's the one that came out and said lavar is healthy, that's not why he's not playing. Beyond that I don't think i've heard a single excuse or explaination about why he's not playing besides the packages thing... so i'd like to see what you're calling fish tales and this multitude of excuses from a guy that only talks to the media once a week.... and watch who you're telling to check their loyalties, GW won 6 games for us last year, lavar won 0, so obviously winning and team success must not be important to you, but it is to me. oh yeah, Gibbs picked GW personally and entrusted not just lavar, BUT THE ENTIRE DEFENSE to him as well as personnel decisions etc... GIBBS SPECIFICLY PICKED GW, he had absolutely no say in inheriting lavar. |
|
10-21-2005, 09:31 PM | #64 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
My loyalties comment was in response to this....
you really need help, GW won games for us last year, lavar didn't. How can you be a bigger fan of lavar than the team? that seems kinda nuts. team loyalty..read what i said i am saying lavar has been a redskin longer than williams ...i feel everybody suddenly blamed him.... acted like he was some bum saying if he does this...if he can do that... |
10-21-2005, 09:41 PM | #65 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
It was just a matter of time. Or one more rushing TD by a RB who would have been anhilated by the "L". Welcome back LA, we missed you.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
10-21-2005, 11:26 PM | #66 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,495
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
and though lavar may have been a redskin longer, GW is MUCH more important to the team. Lavar + another DC (with champ) were on the 25th best D, GW without champ OR lavar had the 5th best D, so you can kind of see why i think GW might be just slightly more useful to the skins than a bench-warmer. |
|
10-22-2005, 01:13 AM | #67 |
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 45
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
OK, here is my opinion on the whole LaVar thing and correct me if I might be wrong, because I have been there before. Arrington was hurt the majority of last season, and could not participate in training camp for the most part. It takes a while to get back into playing shape. Maybe he has just now caught up to everyone else in the stamina department and is now fully healthy and in game playing form. That would explain the lack of playing time. They might have given him a few plays early on in the season to do both test him and get the early season gitters out. Then hold him back and piss him off from a Pshcholigical stand point and then unleash him with something to proove. This in turn would provoke two things. To play harder, within the scheme, and win back his starting job. And most importantly force hime to step up and be the leader that corresponds to his playmaking ability. Maybe, just maybe, I am right and our coaches know how to motivate and coach in two aspects of the game, both Physical and Psychilogical.
|
10-22-2005, 01:32 AM | #68 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
so pumped to hear lavar will see the field this sunday. so...so pumped. i can smell the turnovers coming
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
10-22-2005, 01:37 AM | #69 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,495
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
|
|
10-22-2005, 01:44 AM | #70 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 26
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
|
|
10-22-2005, 01:29 PM | #71 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
in closing Braves on the WARPATH!!!! HAIL VICTORY!!!!!!! scalp the bastards lol |
|
10-22-2005, 01:32 PM | #72 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
10-22-2005, 01:45 PM | #73 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,365
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Nobody turned on LaVar for cryin' out loud.
I think everyone has presented their case as to why they support the coaches' decisions quite well, yet it keeps getting turned in to we hate LaVar and turned our backs on him. That's simply not the case. But if that's what will make you feel better when he has a big game and "proves us all wrong" so be it. |
10-22-2005, 04:19 PM | #74 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,501
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
__________________
Joe Crisp covered Redskins camps for TheWarpath.net for three years. He also covered Redskins Training Camp 2005 for The Daily Progress. |
|
10-22-2005, 09:38 PM | #75 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Good News Lavar Fans!!!
Quote:
|
|
|
|