Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Report that Gibbs has talked to postons about winslow

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2004, 05:03 PM   #1
PSUskinsfan11
Impact Rookie
 
PSUskinsfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 39
Posts: 692
Report that Gibbs has talked to postons about winslow

No!!!!!!!!

Taylor 2004!!!!!!!!
PSUskinsfan11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-23-2004, 05:21 PM   #2
JudgeJebus
Camp Scrub
 
JudgeJebus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 85
Where did you hear this?
JudgeJebus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:47 PM   #3
skins009
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
I heard it too, this it not good. Tonight I will pray to god that the redskins draft Sean Tayler.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 05:55 PM   #4
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 4,453
Mark Schlereth seemed to think that Winslow would force Gibbs to change his whole offensive scheme, on the Draft show today, and thinks that Gibbs wont take him. Sounds good too me...Meryl Hodge on the other hand is obscessed with Winslow and thinks he should be taken #1 overall...hehe
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 06:11 PM   #5
PSUskinsfan11
Impact Rookie
 
PSUskinsfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 39
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by JudgeJebus
Where did you hear this?

ESPN some reporter was in Washington and he said that basically we will not trade the pick but they are going through film as old as 2 years ago between Taylor and Winslow and he said that Gibbs has even talked to the Postons about Winslow. I hope to God this is a smokescreen and they are doing this just so no one trades up to take Taylor
PSUskinsfan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 06:27 PM   #6
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 59
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C
Mark Schlereth seemed to think that Winslow would force Gibbs to change his whole offensive scheme, on the Draft show today, and thinks that Gibbs wont take him. Sounds good too me...Meryl Hodge on the other hand is obscessed with Winslow and thinks he should be taken #1 overall...hehe
I tend to agree with sclereth on this one, gibb's as he evolved as a head coach went away from the TE, which I alway's felt was a mistake, but that's what he did, if he does take Winslow it may be an indication that he's going to utilize a lot of the old san diego system to get Winslow the ball, he know's how to do it that's not a problem, it's whether he want's to ajust his game [gibb's] to accomadate Winslow.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 07:33 PM   #7
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,702
Look, isn't it true that Gibbs offense uses the H-back a lot? Wouldn't KW II be the H-back? What would he have to change? RUn more pass plays to the H-back? Why not? What LB in the league could cover him? If the kid can block, he's a great fit. And skinsncanes tells us he can block.

If they take KW II, they'll have one of the most potent offenses in the league. I like Taylor too, but this is a good pick, assuming he doesn't hold out.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 08:10 PM   #8
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 59
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWsleep
Look, isn't it true that Gibbs offense uses the H-back a lot? Wouldn't KW II be the H-back? What would he have to change? RUn more pass plays to the H-back? Why not? What LB in the league could cover him? If the kid can block, he's a great fit. And skinsncanes tells us he can block.

If they take KW II, they'll have one of the most potent offenses in the league. I like Taylor too, but this is a good pick, assuming he doesn't hold out.
I think it's a misconception, he seldom used the h-back or TE's for anything other than blocking, that will obviously have to change if we draft Winslow.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 08:15 PM   #9
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,702
Well, his experience with KW I in San Diego shows he can do it. Also, I remember "Touchdown" Terry Orr catching a few. And Clint Didier. But the point is that Gibbs offense uses this position in very creative ways. With a real weapon like KW II, it could be awesome. Again, I'm all for Taylor. But I think it's wrong to say that this would be a wasted pick or a terrible mistake. KW II is a real talent at a position the skins need to fill.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 08:36 PM   #10
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,384
Personally I think we have enough weapons on offense. But if Gibbs wants Winslow I guess I won't be too disappointed even though I prefer Taylor.

In Gibbs I trust!
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 09:00 PM   #11
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,812
plus he may be changing some of his offensive schemes to better suit the talent he has. he's already said he's gonna "steal" a few plays and formations here and there from some of the offenses that have been productive over the past few years. kc's offense could be a prime candidate if winslow is taken or even the vikings who utilize kleinsauser pretty well.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 09:02 PM   #12
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Personally I think we have enough weapons on offense. But if Gibbs wants Winslow I guess I won't be too disappointed even though I prefer Taylor.

In Gibbs I trust!
The honest to God's truth is, I don't care who they draft - just so long as Gibbs is coaching 'em.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 09:10 PM   #13
kingerock
Special Teams
 
kingerock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Age: 48
Posts: 360
I personally would steer clear from both and go for a DT, but like JoeRedskin says, it doesn't matter with Daddy Gibbs at the helm.
__________________
Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C.
kingerock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 09:22 PM   #14
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,453
Joe Gibbs never had a star receiving hback that would be a threat to send in motion, except when he was in San Diego, and had KW. And whats the big deal about saying Gibbs would have to change his offense, he hasnt coached in over 10 years. He doesnt have an offense anymore. He even said he watched a ton of film of all the teams that were succeeding and has been stealing their plays and adding his own twists to them. Worrying that he will have to adjust is going to be a problem whether he gets KWII or not, but its somethign none of us really worry about.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 09:33 PM   #15
Cush
Impact Rookie
 
Cush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 963
Quote:
Personally I think we have enough weapons on offense
Agree, they should go D. I still don't understand why they had to give Denver a 2nd round pick in the Champ/Portis deal. There will be plently on D linemen available in the 2nd round
Cush is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.13466 seconds with 10 queries