Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Overthecap.com - a look at cash spending

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2014, 11:41 AM   #1
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 56
Posts: 21,179
Overthecap.com - a look at cash spending

The new CBA instituted a 4 year cash minimum(2013-2016,2017-2020). This article is a well written yet still mind boggling look at just how these numbers are arrived at, the impact on teams, and speaks to the Redskins specifically at one point. Not surprisingly we have a large deficit when looking at cash spending the last two years, which may lead to a few upfront money deals this year and next.

A Look at Cash Spending in the NFL and the Impact on Free Agency - Over the Cap
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-10-2014, 12:06 PM   #2
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 44
Posts: 12,416
Re: Overthecap.com - a look at cash spending

Wonder if the Redskins would be expected to make up the spending they couldn't during the implementation of the $36M penalty. They refrained from signing a few players last year because of it. Would the league then ask them to catch up on the spending this year and next?

Wouldn't seem right if they did. But it's probably a non-issue. We're looking to spend anyway, we'll clear the team minimum. Especially once we sign Trent and Kerrigan after next season, and possibly RGIII.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 12:26 PM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Overthecap.com - a look at cash spending

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Wonder if the Redskins would be expected to make up the spending they couldn't during the implementation of the $36M penalty. They refrained from signing a few players last year because of it. Would the league then ask them to catch up on the spending this year and next?

Wouldn't seem right if they did. But it's probably a non-issue. We're looking to spend anyway, we'll clear the team minimum. Especially once we sign Trent and Kerrigan after next season, and possibly RGIII.
There's no way the 2016 Redskins aren't going to be a cash over cap team. With the cash spend average at 89%, they'll clear it easily.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.10619 seconds with 12 queries