Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2017, 02:19 PM   #1
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 44
Posts: 12,416
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyerSkin View Post
Funny as hell!!!! Still, I would like to get that
Northwestern wideout. He was very good. If
Josh stays healthy and we got him, we would be the deepest we corp in the entire league.
As long as we don't have the thinnest front 7, I'm good with that.

While BPA is my overarching philosophy, I wouldn't put a high pick into a position that's already extremely deep. I'm not taking an offensive tackle with my 1st rounder, for example, even if an OT is BPA at the time.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 02:27 PM   #2
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
As long as we don't have the thinnest front 7, I'm good with that.

While BPA is my overarching philosophy, I wouldn't put a high pick into a position that's already extremely deep. I'm not taking an offensive tackle with my 1st rounder, for example, even if an OT is BPA at the time.
Completely agree. Then you try to trade down if you can. We knew Garcon and Jackson wouldn't be back. Whoever you pick can get hurt. If he's healthy this year I think he's gonna shine and don't regret the pick at all. I think Pryor is gonna be good but what if he isn't and we didn't draft Doctson?
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 11:18 AM   #3
mredskins
MVP
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,497
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

I hope we order a Ruben on Thursday.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 11:58 AM   #4
Irrefutable
The Starter
 
Irrefutable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

The slow rebuilding plan is working great, 3 playoff wins in the last 24 years. The future is now. It is unlikely KC will be here next year, as well as other key members of the team. This wait until next year strategy is not working.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...dskins_seasons
Irrefutable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 01:06 PM   #5
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,921
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irrefutable View Post
The slow rebuilding plan is working great, 3 playoff wins in the last 24 years. The future is now. It is unlikely KC will be here next year, as well as other key members of the team. This wait until next year strategy is not working.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...dskins_seasons
dude calm down
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 04:27 PM   #6
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,134
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irrefutable View Post
The slow rebuilding plan is working great, 3 playoff wins in the last 24 years. The future is now. It is unlikely KC will be here next year, as well as other key members of the team. This wait until next year strategy is not working.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...dskins_seasons
Ok so what would be your plan? That future is now shit has not worked around here. We've been there and done that. There are no quick fixes in the NFL.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 04:31 PM   #7
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Ok so what would be your plan? That future is now shit has not worked around here. We've been there and done that. There are no quick fixes in the NFL.
if we can just get bruce smith and deion sanders under contract, we should be good. #backtothefutureisnow
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 05:50 PM   #8
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,142
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
if we can just get bruce smith and deion sanders under contract, we should be good. #backtothefutureisnow
Mark Carrier too
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 09:31 PM   #9
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,134
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

This kid Reddick out of Temple seems to be getting a lot of talk lately. He's only 230lbs so I'm not sure if he can rush the passer at OLB. I was reading that they put him at ILB at the Senior Bowl. That seems like an interesting spot. He could be what we need, someone that's fast, explosive and can make plays.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 10:51 PM   #10
Irrefutable
The Starter
 
Irrefutable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Ok so what would be your plan? That future is now shit has not worked around here. We've been there and done that. There are no quick fixes in the NFL.
trade down unless a great player at a position of need is available. Do not trade for picks in next year's draft . Draft players at positions of need.... there are plenty of needs, so what if they are rated slightly lower.

Rumor is the Texans wants to move up about 8 spots to get a QB. The Redskins would get pick #25 and the Texans #2 pick.... for pick #17

If the Redskins can come up with 12 picks, then maybe they will find more than 2 who contribute in 2017
Irrefutable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2017, 10:56 AM   #11
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,134
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irrefutable View Post
trade down unless a great player at a position of need is available. Do not trade for picks in next year's draft . Draft players at positions of need.... there are plenty of needs, so what if they are rated slightly lower.

Rumor is the Texans wants to move up about 8 spots to get a QB. The Redskins would get pick #25 and the Texans #2 pick.... for pick #17

If the Redskins can come up with 12 picks, then maybe they will find more than 2 who contribute in 2017
Again though, it's flat out stupid to judge a draft after one year. Doc, Cravens, Fuller could all have a huge impact on this years team. I think SM traded for extra picks in this years draft cause it's obviously deeper on the defensive side of the ball.

Also if you get three players out of a draft that become good players then that's a good draft.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2017, 11:45 AM   #12
Irrefutable
The Starter
 
Irrefutable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Again though, it's flat out stupid to judge a draft after one year. Doc, Cravens, Fuller could all have a huge impact on this years team. I think SM traded for extra picks in this years draft cause it's obviously deeper on the defensive side of the ball.

Also if you get three players out of a draft that become good players then that's a good draft.


You could win the power ball too.

No, you will never be a playoff team if all you can get is 3 good players per draft.
Irrefutable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2017, 12:06 AM   #13
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,590
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irrefutable View Post
The slow rebuilding plan is working great, 3 playoff wins in the last 24 years. The future is now. It is unlikely KC will be here next year, as well as other key members of the team. This wait until next year strategy is not working.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...dskins_seasons
Have you been watching the past 24 seasons? How many times did we try the win now strategy?

Free Agent splurges.
College Coach with a surefire offense that overhauls the team.
Trade away the future for a surefire QB prospect.

Just to name a few examples of failed win now attempts.

The slow rebuild is only 3 years in. There has been a significant improvement on offense, and we started by building a strong o line and developing a QB. Defense has been neglected in recent off seasons, but that largely has to do with what opportunities were available. We have been signing free agents to smart contracts and resigning productive guys and letting people walk that aren't worth their market value. This is how to build a long term winner. See the Patriots. Name me one team that has had sustained success with this supposed win now strategy?

And what specifically are you suggesting be done differently? Is this an argument against BPA? Let's think, did the skins ever reach and over saturate a position of need in the draft? Do the names Malcom Kelly and Devin Thomas ring a bell? I guess it is pretty easy to forget them TBH.
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2017, 02:04 AM   #14
Irrefutable
The Starter
 
Irrefutable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WillH View Post
Have you been watching the past 24 seasons? How many times did we try the win now strategy?

Free Agent splurges.
College Coach with a surefire offense that overhauls the team.
Trade away the future for a surefire QB prospect.

Just to name a few examples of failed win now attempts.

The slow rebuild is only 3 years in. There has been a significant improvement on offense, and we started by building a strong o line and developing a QB. Defense has been neglected in recent off seasons, but that largely has to do with what opportunities were available. We have been signing free agents to smart contracts and resigning productive guys and letting people walk that aren't worth their market value. This is how to build a long term winner. See the Patriots. Name me one team that has had sustained success with this supposed win now strategy?

And what specifically are you suggesting be done differently? Is this an argument against BPA? Let's think, did the skins ever reach and over saturate a position of need in the draft? Do the names Malcom Kelly and Devin Thomas ring a bell? I guess it is pretty easy to forget them TBH.
I said nothing about signing high priced free agents.

Nothing about coaches.

And I want to trade down, not up in the draft.

They could lose 4/5 of the offensive line in the next year or two. And the starting QB,WR, ILB, S could be gone next year as well. The 3 to 5 year plan starts over next year.

Good teams are built in the early to mid rounds in the draft..... Such as Cousins, Reed,Crowder, maybe Cravens. However, 1 or 2 good mid round picks a year and you will be rebuilding forever.
Irrefutable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2017, 09:36 PM   #15
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,921
Re: With the 17 pick, the Washington Redskins select...

Per Keim on Twitter:
"was told ONLY off position they'd take is RB"

This is in regards to the 17th pick.

First, it makes sense. So Oline, TE, WR and QB(I don't think they would ever consider) are all off the board for 17. Second, they are really considering RB and it also lets us know RB is a spot under the microscope they will be looking to improve, if not at 17, then probably somewhere in the top half of the draft. Again, makes sense.

Keim also said tonight (he's doing some mock espn draft show) pass rushers are a major focus with the draft.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26848 seconds with 10 queries