Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


"Don't embarass the team" rule

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2004, 06:36 PM   #16
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,293
We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-31-2004, 07:00 PM   #17
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.
10 penalties for 82 yards is something I thought we solved. Derrick Dockery has to be one of the most underserving lineman to start for this team. He still makes the same mistakes over and over.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2004, 11:22 AM   #18
SkinsRock
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 54
Posts: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.
Understood that it's not all Brunell, but sometimes it just takes a change to spark the rest of the team and make them perform better. Who knows if it will, but it certainly couldn't hurt to give it a shot at this point. But Gibbs won't do it. I hate to say it, but I was actually hoping Brunell would have gotten injured so Gibbs would have to put Ramsey in there....nothing real bad, but just enough to give Patrick 1-2 starts to see what he could do...
And as for the protection, yeah it was lacking, but it was still nothing near what it was last year.
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2004, 02:48 PM   #19
joehardee
Camp Scrub
 
joehardee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18
with the line blocking like that , 4 sacks- mobile be for real.
joehardee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2004, 08:13 PM   #20
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,468
Quote:
so whats worse, inaccurate but non-INT passes or sacks?
umm... 2 ints and 4 sacks, check the facts, your wrong.

All this crap about ramsey, INT-King are stupid, since brunell's been here his TD/TO ratio is worse than ramsey's, and he's had a better scheme (in most people's eyes)... sailing slow balls high isn't preventing INTs, its preventing completions.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.48059 seconds with 12 queries