|
View Poll Results: Who Will Be the #5 WR? | |||
Keith Eloi | 1 | 0.64% | |
DJ Hackett | 26 | 16.67% | |
Marques Hagans | 6 | 3.85% | |
Marko Mitchell | 122 | 78.21% | |
Trent Shelton | 1 | 0.64% | |
Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
08-21-2009, 03:42 PM | #1 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,382
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
Hackett based on his experience.
Mitchell will be on the PS. |
08-21-2009, 03:49 PM | #2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
I hate putting a guy on the practice squad that was drafted. If he gets picked up by another team and becomes a player, it will have been a completely wasted draft pick, not that we haven't wasted picks in the past. :frusty:
|
08-21-2009, 10:35 PM | #3 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 336
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
I agree, I really think someone would pick him up. Hackett has been around, and clearly doesnt have "IT". Hagans has some potential, but is still very raw and we havent invested anything in him. MM being the draft pick, Im hoping they keep him around.
|
08-21-2009, 03:51 PM | #4 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,382
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
What's the probability of a losing a 7th round WR from the PS? Probably pretty slim.
|
08-21-2009, 04:36 PM | #5 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
True, but, if he's a draft pick that goes on the PS, he's probably not in the future plans.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
08-21-2009, 05:20 PM | #6 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
|
08-21-2009, 06:28 PM | #7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
Huh? We drafted him. Not getting this statement. With out the "un" maybe..lol
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
08-21-2009, 07:09 PM | #8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
|
08-22-2009, 04:24 PM | #9 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
|
08-21-2009, 08:52 PM | #10 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,382
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
Ok but back to my question, what is the probability of losing him??
|
08-22-2009, 01:43 AM | #11 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
Quote:
Probability high to teams who may have lost a WR due to injury and Marko show's pretty good skills in preseason. I'm guessing Zorn is leaning towards Hackett only cause he knows the system but again I say he has done nothing in this league that screams future of this team or team leader. We have Moss and ARE as vets, lets bring in some youth. Who knows maybe he will be another star WR plucked from the later rounds. Funny if he out performs Thomas and Kelly. Doubtfull due to lack of playing time and time in the league and system. |
|
08-21-2009, 03:53 PM | #12 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
Slim or not, I'd hate to lose him. I think his upside is pretty good and could possibly help us this year.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
08-21-2009, 03:56 PM | #13 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 56
Posts: 21,193
|
Re: Clinton Portis Loves Marko Mitchell
I doubt we put a draft pick that shows promise on the PS. I also believe he has the potential to make the team on merit. Hackett wasn't even our first choice between Roydell Williams and himself. For me, Hackett is the definition of a camp body. (Eloi also). If Hackett were a killer ST player, then he could definitely take up Thrash's mantle, but as a 5th receiver he has less potential than Mitchell.
|
08-21-2009, 04:22 PM | #14 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Depth Chart: 5 receivers
This is MY depth chart as far as the WRs are concerned. I hope most will agree. I am so pissed that Hagans and Thrash are on the new Madden. What's up with that? Thrash has been gone for a while..
1. Moss (no explanation needed) 2. Devin Thomas (takes pressure off Moss and has exceptional speed) 3. A.R.E (This position is more sutiable for him from what I've read) 4. Malcom Kelly (could have been 2-3 - But He needs to improve on route running) 5. Marko Mitchell (he has been shining in traning camp..Ask Carlos Rogers..lol) Also see CLinton Portis loves Marko Mitchell http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-l...-mitchell.html What are your thoughts? I know Hackett knows the offense and Hagans is versatile (wonder if the wildcat or anything has to do with him being here since he was a former QB..Probably not..Poor mans A.R.E. to me) I think Marko is a diamond in the rough and we should not chance letting another team pick him up. Having another WR with height and that can burn would be a nice compliment to Devin and Malcom in the future. We would be set for years. Moss and ARE aren't exactly spring chickens..
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 08-21-2009 at 04:43 PM. |
08-21-2009, 04:29 PM | #15 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 44
Posts: 12,416
|
Re: Depth Chart: 5 receivers
Need a point of clarification. Is this your suggested depth chart, or what the depth chart actually is?
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|