Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2009, 03:01 PM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,362
Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal - Redskins Insider
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-24-2009, 03:04 PM   #2
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,216
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Finally, some real news.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:06 PM   #3
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 54
Posts: 2,015
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

I agree, real news is good and I'm glad Samuels decided to restructure.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:12 PM   #4
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 10,164
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

ahh, the yearly restructure cha cha

1-2 re-structure-him
3-4 re-structure-him

We'd win freaking Dancing with the Stars if we could do this dance for it.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:15 PM   #5
DirtyLandry
Special Teams
 
DirtyLandry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lost in the sauce
Posts: 377
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

So I asked in the (shhh) A.H. thread, but what do you guys think this means? Are we just clearing more space for draft and a few slightly above average FA's or could this, dare I say it, be the signs of a BIG splash? thoughts anyone.
__________________
"I just went from six to midnight."
DirtyLandry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:16 PM   #6
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,216
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyLandry View Post
So I asked in the (shhh) A.H. thread, but what do you guys think this means? Are we just clearing more space for draft and a few slightly above average FA's or could this, dare I say it, be the signs of a BIG splash? thoughts anyone.
Given the fact that the Redskins are in cap hell again, I would say that this is a typical move and expected.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:19 PM   #7
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

I think the rumours about AH are having the desired effect. Good to hear something concrete. Good for you Chris.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:21 PM   #8
Nflnick11
Special Teams
 
Nflnick11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 432
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

This is great news, sounds like danny wants to reload this offseason, now Taylor has to restructure his deal (hopefully) cut griffin , cut Jansen, and restructure fletcher, and cut springs, that way we can sign d hall haynesworth and Jason brown !! Yes this could work!!!
Nflnick11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:22 PM   #9
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Blah. Lengthening the contract of yet another player over 30 years old. Same old same old. Where we are with Jansen right now (massive decline in talent, too expensive to cut) is where we'll be with Samuels in a few seasons. I know, I know, there may not be a salary cap...
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:23 PM   #10
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nflnick11 View Post
This is great news, sounds like danny wants to reload this offseason, now Taylor has to restructure his deal (hopefully) cut griffin , cut Jansen, and restructure fletcher, and cut springs, that way we can sign d hall haynesworth and Jason brown !! Yes this could work!!!
Well, Jason Taylor is definitely not taking a pay cut, and cutting Jansen would cost us $2M more than it will to keep him.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:28 PM   #11
DirtyLandry
Special Teams
 
DirtyLandry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lost in the sauce
Posts: 377
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Something is brewing at Redskins park.* Regardless of what happens, I can see all the warpathers' minds melting simultaneously.
__________________
"I just went from six to midnight."
DirtyLandry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:28 PM   #12
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 62
Posts: 10,672
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

ill stick up for the skins here. Samuels play has not declined like Jansens. if he wants, looks like he could play another 5 years at a fairly high level. and Ruhskin haven't you learned? the skins are never in cap hell. this is one area the skins have thrived in( cap management)
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:29 PM   #13
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

I try to look at the positive side & that is that they do keep their guys & reward them, despite some key guys getting away over the years. I know it's as much about freeing up cap space, but it does allow them to keep good players.

Based on what the capologists have said, I think if they restructure w/some moderation this year while cutting some vets, that would be a good compromise and they can get a couple mid level free agents. Like JLC said, I don't see how they can free up space for AH. If Hall signs somewhere else early, I'll start to believe it's possible though.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:30 PM   #14
Nflnick11
Special Teams
 
Nflnick11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 432
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Well, Jason Taylor is definitely not taking a pay cut, and cutting Jansen would cost us $2M more than it will to keep him.
Then can't we restructure Jansen so he won't hurt us, or possibly include him in a trade with our 1st round pick to the lions for their 2nd first round pick and more picks, plus Jansen is a Michigan guy, he lives there...I just want Jansen gone
Nflnick11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:30 PM   #15
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Samuels Agrees to Restructured Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Blah. Lengthening the contract of yet another player over 30 years old. Same old same old. Where we are with Jansen right now (massive decline in talent, too expensive to cut) is where we'll be with Samuels in a few seasons. I know, I know, there may not be a salary cap...
I understand what you're saying but you got to pay to play and signing FA's isn't gonna be cheap.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.15630 seconds with 10 queries