Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2011, 11:15 AM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

This one's for you Dirtbag

Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterback
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 11:23 AM   #2
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,258
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

I wouldn't be opposed to bringing in Alex Smith and having him learn under Shanny. We wouldn't be giving up draft picks, and chances are he'd come at a affordable price. Have him compete against Grossman for the starting spot and give it to whoever wins the competition in training camp.

Hasselbeck I'd be more worried about. He's older and he's injured prone at this point.
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 11:29 AM   #3
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,935
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Id give Alex Smith a shot over sitting through a Rex Grossman lead team fo sho.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 03:30 PM   #4
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,138
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Id give Alex Smith a shot over sitting through a Rex Grossman lead team fo sho.
Smith isn't any better than Grossman. You could argue that he's worse.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 04:57 PM   #5
mlmdub130
Playmaker
 
mlmdub130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,238
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Smith isn't any better than Grossman. You could argue that he's worse.
possibly....but alex smith has been in a crappy situation in san fran from day one basically, sometimes a young qb just needs a fresh start. i wouldn't mind seeing him get a shot at all, as long as it is at a very reasonable cost.
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason."

ST21
mlmdub130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 07:20 PM   #6
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Id give Alex Smith a shot over sitting through a Rex Grossman lead team fo sho.
Great. More growing pains. Just like with McNabb, who by the way is a far better QB. Oh well.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 07:53 PM   #7
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,935
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Great. More growing pains. Just like with McNabb, who by the way is a far better QB. Oh well.
Yeah well I personally think so too. But Shanny and his kid dont think so Id say lets cut our losses now and get a 4th or 5th for him. Im good with us struggling again this year if we are making tough choices to get better for the future....But I cant take any drama filled year of Fat F*ck Albert and McNabb vs Shanny again...that sh*t is old in my book.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 07:57 PM   #8
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Heck, I would rather go into the seaosn with John Beck then Rex Grossman.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 11:38 AM   #9
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,382
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

I wouldn't mind adding Smith along with a rookie.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 11:51 AM   #10
SolidSnake84
Playmaker
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,947
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

I like the idea of both Alex Smith and Bruce Gradkowski at QB. Gradkowski is a young version of Jeff Garcia, a savvy veteran who knows how to improvise to keep the play alive, and seems to make others play better around him....
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 11:57 AM   #11
Masshole
Camp Scrub
 
Masshole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 23
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Agreed, re: flyer on Smith. I'm not big on Gradkowski, he's a competent backup, not a starter. The only reason Smith is preferable to Grossman is that he's got a higher upside. Besides, the quarterback class next year, particularly at the top of the draft (Luck, obviously, plus Barkely and Nick Foles) is much stronger in 2012, and we're at least 2 drafts away from being serious again... and will most likely be in the top 15 again, that is, if Shanahan is serious about rebuilding the right way.
Masshole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 11:58 AM   #12
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 52
Posts: 2,665
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Smith is a far better short term option then Grossman but I still want a rookie in the first couple rounds of this draft.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 12:04 PM   #13
Masshole
Camp Scrub
 
Masshole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 23
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

The other thing is, demand seems to be far outpacing supply for quarterbacks in this draft. If we could get Gabbert or Newton that's one thing, but they're not going to fall to us, so we're not going to get good value with our pick, and really, nothing would be worse than us REACHING during this draft, when we have so many needs to fill. And if 5 of the poorer teams in the league all draft quarterbacks this year, the 5 guys most talked about, plus Dalton and Kapaernick all going in the 1st 2 rounds, seems to stand to reason that demand for quarterbacks should drop next year, when the supply will be better. So we can get the best value rather than reaching for someone this year/trading away a key pick from next year to the Patriots to move from 41 to 33 (or 28), to take Locker or Ponder, who the jury is very much still out on.
Masshole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 12:40 PM   #14
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Masshole View Post
The other thing is, demand seems to be far outpacing supply for quarterbacks in this draft. If we could get Gabbert or Newton that's one thing, but they're not going to fall to us, so we're not going to get good value with our pick, and really, nothing would be worse than us REACHING during this draft, when we have so many needs to fill. And if 5 of the poorer teams in the league all draft quarterbacks this year, the 5 guys most talked about, plus Dalton and Kapaernick all going in the 1st 2 rounds, seems to stand to reason that demand for quarterbacks should drop next year, when the supply will be better. So we can get the best value rather than reaching for someone this year/trading away a key pick from next year to the Patriots to move from 41 to 33 (or 28), to take Locker or Ponder, who the jury is very much still out on.
I tend to agree with you! I think it is much easier developing a QB when he has a great supporting cast around him. I would much rather the Redskins focus on building the offensive line up, getting a solid nose tackle, and landing a true #1 WR or the next start RB.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 10:42 PM   #15
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Redskins Reconstruction: Quarterbacks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Masshole View Post
The other thing is, demand seems to be far outpacing supply for quarterbacks in this draft. If we could get Gabbert or Newton that's one thing, but they're not going to fall to us, so we're not going to get good value with our pick, and really, nothing would be worse than us REACHING during this draft, when we have so many needs to fill. And if 5 of the poorer teams in the league all draft quarterbacks this year, the 5 guys most talked about, plus Dalton and Kapaernick all going in the 1st 2 rounds, seems to stand to reason that demand for quarterbacks should drop next year, when the supply will be better. So we can get the best value rather than reaching for someone this year/trading away a key pick from next year to the Patriots to move from 41 to 33 (or 28), to take Locker or Ponder, who the jury is very much still out on.
Some mocks have us going with Ponder from FSU, which to me personally wouldn't be such a bad option. I know Sam Bradford looks like he will be a stud, but most of these high profile guys do not make an impact. Look at the two QBs with the most rings the past decade: Big Ben and Brady. Both were considered low end QB prospects. Big Ben did garner more press than Tom, but still wasn't near the ludicrous level of Cam Newton. This kid(Newton) has a huge ass head, but not too sure if he has much of a brain in it though.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.19286 seconds with 10 queries