|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-20-2010, 02:59 PM | #1 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 752
|
79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net |
|
Advertisements |
01-20-2010, 10:13 PM | #2 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Skins fan in the Dallas area
Posts: 187
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
This means we are dumb if we go along with this...or we could be baiting teams to pull the trigger on a trade so we can trade down....either way....OFFENSIVE LINE PLEASE
__________________
We are finally looking like a respectable opponent.....Lets keep it going!!! |
01-20-2010, 10:32 PM | #3 |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
I will say this at this point... with Shannahan and Bruce Allen running the show, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt with whatever they attempt to do. If that means drafting smaller linemen later to run the zone blocking and drafing a QB in the first and not a LT, then, while I would rather have a linemen, I'm gonna give them the benefit of the doubt..
__________________
#21 |
01-20-2010, 10:50 PM | #4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
i'm in the anybody but campbell club...
|
01-21-2010, 10:06 AM | #5 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,360
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
More proof of how meaningless mocks are
|
01-21-2010, 10:14 AM | #6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
I think its safe to say that all the QBs in the draft will still be on the board when we draft at 4... which means we should have several teams calling us to trade down.
(of course, these same teams could not trust us to NOT take the QB they want and just trade with Tampta Bay)
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
01-21-2010, 10:15 AM | #7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 3,106
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
|
|
01-21-2010, 11:08 AM | #8 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 909
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Are you suggesting that Allen and Shanahan have some other way of deciding who to draft?
__________________
“Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.” |
01-21-2010, 11:10 AM | #9 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,360
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
dart boards
|
01-21-2010, 11:25 AM | #10 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 909
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
__________________
“Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.” |
01-21-2010, 11:31 AM | #11 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4843237 |
|
01-21-2010, 11:34 AM | #12 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
watching bradford's highlight reels, almost all of the plays he is in shotgun. the only time i saw him under center was for handoffs or play action passes.
i'd prefer clausen over bradford but like whats been said in here; im giving shanahan, allen and the DS the beneift of the doubt that they have the most information and best idea of what is best for this team. man, that is so refreshing as a skins fan.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
01-21-2010, 02:54 PM | #13 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 38
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
If you find a QB that you know can be a star you draft him. Vinny didn't take lineman period (save Rinehart) and that was our problem. Not hesitating to draft two guys at positions like LB, WR, S, and CB yet never willing to draft more then one O-Lineman. Give the front office the beniefit of the doubt, we don't need to select an O-Lineman with the first pick to fix our O-Line. Also remember this. The Chiefs did the "smart" thing in 2008. Drafting a D-Lineman (Dorsey) and a LT in Albert, yet they have won 6 games in the last two years (with ironically one of those victories coming against us). The Falcons have won 20 games since drafting Ryan. Again the point being if you see a QB that you know you can develop into a franchise guy you take him.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
01-21-2010, 03:53 PM | #14 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
One of the big reasons that they were able to rebuild so fast is because they were able to find a high second round pick for DeAngelo Hall in a trade, and consequently, they had the ammo to get up into position for Baker when Vinny came calling. The obvious is that, even with this years (somewhat inevitable) setback, Atlanta did rebuilding the right way. They also got quite lucky. They evaluated Ryan properly, they didn't shoot their load to move up and get him, and they didn't overvalue a defensive lineman simply because of his position on the field. Ryan was the right guy for them, and there was no reason (at least in hindsight) for them to pass on that pick. They had the necessary team infrastructure to make it work from day one IF Ryan had the goods, which it appears he does. Let's not confuse drafting a D-Lineman high vs. drafting an O-Lineman high though. Drafting a D-Lineman high seems to be a very bad historical proposition for a rebuilding team, worse than drafting a quarterback high. The reasons are similar. Like a quarterback, all but the best defensive lineman in the game are dependent on their defensive teammates for opportunities. This is not true of a great corner, a game-changing safety, or a standout linebacker. All of those pieces are excellent places to start your defense. Whereas a game changing pass rusher may be the most valuable piece, it is useless on a defense that offers nothing outside of that one pass rusher (see: Elvis Dumerville's 2008 season). Drafting an offensive lineman high is never a bad call, if the pick itself plays up to the value spent on the pick. Reaching is still reaching, of course. Robert Gallery should not have been drafted with the No. 2 overall pick. The Raiders would have been much better off with Philip Rivers or Ben Roethlisberger, even though Gallery has started more games than Rivers, and his gross career value is probably similar to Roethlisbergers, he's far, far more replaceable than either of those guys, and thusly, was not as good of a draft pick. If Russell Okung is there, the Redskins can't pass on him. If he's not there, they can go in a whole bunch of directions, including defense and offensive skill positions, quarterback, and next best offensive lineman. Pretty much the only place(s) they can't afford to go is defensive line (and tight end), and if by some miracle Suh is there at No. 4, you'd have to at least consider it (before not drafting him).
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
01-21-2010, 04:00 PM | #15 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
And then the obvious disclaimer: even if you don't believe that Jason Campbell has much of a future in Washington, there are still 9 (8, if both TEs are counted) positions on the offense where we are receiving less per-play production than quarterback. And of the 8, only Antwaan Randle El is really even providing close to the level of expected production, and I don't believe he's all that irreplaceable in the greater sense. [The stats don't say "Randle El shouldn't be cut" but they do say that "everyone else that isn't Randle El probably should be"]
Not all of those positions can be addressed in one draft, and not all those positions would be practical targets with the 4th overall pick. The point is: that's a whole lot of non-quarterback related suck, and to say that there's no one we can find at No. 4 overall except Okung that would fix the problem seems like kind of a defeatist attitude. There's got to be a WR, RB, or OL not named Russell Okung who is worthy of the 4th overall pick. I would think.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|