Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)

- Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - f...gibbs (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=19970)

[quote=Southpaw;356765]A muffed handoff, bad exchange, whatever you want to call it, but it was not 100% Portis. Campbell seemed to be quite a distance away from Portis when he was making the handoff, which obviously shouldn't have been the case.

And I'm not excusing Portis from blame at all. That was a horribly executed play. My point to you is, Portis fumbling has nothing to do with Betts' inability to get into the endzone, in two attempts from the one yard line.[/quote]Campbell was going to put it right in his gut and Portis reached to grab it. That's on Portis 100% of the time.

He probably won't do it again for the rest of this season, but Campbell did everything he was supposed to. Portis knows it was his fault, we don't have to defend him. It was a mistake, its over.

Hey, they had a bad day! Sometimes the offense doesn't click and the defense gets tired. Redskins are still #1.

Its only week 3 and the fairweather fans have surfaced. shame on you. for everyone saying this guy can't play and he sucks, remember Redskins tryouts are open to everyone. Hit the gym and get some cleats on your feet.

[QUOTE=DirteePosse;356949]Hey, they had a bad day! Sometimes the offense doesn't click and the defense gets tired. Redskins are still #1.

Its only week 3 and the fairweather fans have surfaced. shame on you. for everyone saying this guy can't play and he sucks, remember Redskins tryouts are open to everyone. Hit the gym and get some cleats on your feet.[/QUOTE]

Well said!! People forget it was also a short week. If people want to whine, then go root for the Forty Whiners!!

[quote=skinsfan69;356912]Dude, your a complete fool. Portis would not have made it in. Saying Betts does not have a nose for the endzone is just stupid. Bugel even said so. He sees the guy up close every single day. He said that Betts can slam it there in short yardage just as good as Portis. Where Portis excels is in open field.

Dumbass, Shotgun on first down would have been just fine. Throw it in the endzone on 1st down. That way it's either incomplete, or a TD. Then go under center 2nd 3rd and 4th down.

And I'm not gay for the Pats. Your probably gay for Portis.[/quote]

yes he would have. portis would have followed his block "OUTSIDE" instead of trying to cut it into the teeth of that D just like he did in philly and earlier in the game. looking at their career touchdowns "a-hole" then tell me who gets into the endzone ....tell me how you get 1100 yards and only 4 touchdowns??s then how you get 500 yards and 7 touchdowns. yeah thats right clinton portis has 55 touchdowns in his career. ladell betts has 9. portis knows how to score and is a better back so he has gotten more of a chance. they were both drafted in 2002 so it speaks margins about portis's ability to score no matter where from. if you cant see that then you are freaking blind. joe bugel is never gonna call out one of his players and he shouldnt that would be retarded....but if you believe everything you hear out of redskins park, then you are retarded. in any respect portis a better goaline runner, and yes he excells more in space also but portis is a more physical runner. ask your boy aikman who you were quoting so much earlier who is a more physical slam it in there runner, because he talked about portis's phyicality yesterday and how rare it is a guy his size runs and blocks like he does. and incase you missed it, al saunders called it out that they had a wide open touchdown on the play action pass from the 1, but campbell threw under to sellers instead of a wide open cooley in the back. and incase you didnt see the third down play, watch it again and watch where sellers goes and where betts cut it into....goaline rule as a runner, let the fullback lead you and he went outside while betts cut it into the teeth, something clinton would not have done and even if he did, he doesnt go down as easy.

you can say all you want about my logic, smootsmack can regulate this board but you are reacting the same way i am because we dont have the same views.....attacking each other is what makes it fun....in my opinion your perspective sucks and its funny how easy it is to tell between a guy who played the game and a fan, and you just the fan, nothing wrong with being the fan because i am and have been one a long time... oh and by the way nice come back "i am not gay for the pats, your probably gay for portis" haha man you were reaching there, but to answer you yes i am gay for portis hahha

regulators!!!!!!!! mount up.......i should be hearing from smootsmack

You know how bad the bye week is going to be with all the blaming going on now...let's get over it and move on. It is what it is...let's deal with it.
Go Skins !!!

[quote=DCborn;356967]You know how bad the bye week is going to be with all the blaming going on now...let's get over it and move on. It is what it is...let's deal with it.
Go Skins !!![/quote]

i am down with that....i just love to get after it big time on mondays after a loss, helps me vent.

[QUOTE=Mattyk72;356758]Seems that those that complain the most after a loss typically have [U]nothing[/U] to say after a win. I swear some people just relish a loss so they can play armchair GM/Coach/QB all week.[/QUOTE]

It also seems like some will drink the cool-aid regardless of what is going on.

I have been here with every win and every loss. I am actually more vocal with wins...but this loss stunk, and it was the coaching.

Not sure if you were referring to me or not, thought I'd mention that.

[QUOTE=skinsfan69;356912]Dude, your a complete fool. Portis would not have made it in. Saying Betts does not have a nose for the endzone is just stupid. Bugel even said so. He sees the guy up close every single day. He said that Betts can slam it there in short yardage just as good as Portis. Where Portis excels is in open field.

Dumbass, Shotgun on first down would have been just fine. Throw it in the endzone on 1st down. That way it's either incomplete, or a TD. Then go under center 2nd 3rd and 4th down.

And I'm not gay for the Pats. Your probably gay for Portis.[/QUOTE]

That's probably the most productive post I've ever seen on the warpath...

[quote=holcknowsbest;356960]yes he would have. portis would have followed his block "OUTSIDE" instead of trying to cut it into the teeth of that D just like he did in philly and earlier in the game. looking at their career touchdowns "a-hole" then tell me who gets into the endzone ....tell me how you get 1100 yards and only 4 touchdowns??s then how you get 500 yards and 7 touchdowns. yeah thats right clinton portis has 55 touchdowns in his career. ladell betts has 9. portis knows how to score and is a better back so he has gotten more of a chance. they were both drafted in 2002 so it speaks margins about portis's ability to score no matter where from. if you cant see that then you are freaking blind. joe bugel is never gonna call out one of his players and he shouldnt that would be retarded....but if you believe everything you hear out of redskins park, then you are retarded. in any respect portis a better goaline runner, and yes he excells more in space also but portis is a more physical runner. ask your boy aikman who you were quoting so much earlier who is a more physical slam it in there runner, because he talked about portis's phyicality yesterday and how rare it is a guy his size runs and blocks like he does. and incase you missed it, al saunders called it out that they had a wide open touchdown on the play action pass from the 1, but campbell threw under to sellers instead of a wide open cooley in the back. and incase you didnt see the third down play, watch it again and watch where sellers goes and where betts cut it into....goaline rule as a runner, let the fullback lead you and he went outside while betts cut it into the teeth, something clinton would not have done and even if he did, he doesnt go down as easy.

you can say all you want about my logic, smootsmack can regulate this board but you are reacting the same way i am because we dont have the same views.....attacking each other is what makes it fun....in my opinion your perspective sucks and its funny how easy it is to tell between a guy who played the game and a fan, and you just the fan, nothing wrong with being the fan because i am and have been one a long time... oh and by the way nice come back "i am not gay for the pats, your probably gay for portis" haha man you were reaching there, but to answer you yes i am gay for portis hahha[/quote]

FYI....to CP butt boy. I played too. QB. We ran a very similar offense that the Skins do. Although it's no where near the volume. The numbers system or passsing tree with combo routes, plus specific names for all RB routes.

What did you play? Let me guess? Center? You probably liked it when the QB put his hands under your ass.

For the last time, are you done?

[quote=SmootSmack;357006]For the last time, are you done?[/quote]

I'm done.

I don't really know who started it and so, without calling out in particular just yet, I think it should be known that a public flogging is about to take place.

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;357009]I don't really know who started it and so, without calling out in particular just yet, I think it should be known that a public flogging is about to take place.[/quote]

He started it all the way 100%. He got all pissed like a little 2 year old cry baby w/out his milk bottle cause I said the Pats cheating didn't affect the outcome of the games.

[quote=holcknowsbest;356960]yes he would have. portis would have followed his block "OUTSIDE" instead of trying to cut it into the teeth of that D just like he did in philly and earlier in the game.[/quote]Okay?[QUOTE] looking at their career touchdowns "a-hole" then tell me who gets into the endzone ....tell me how you get 1100 yards and only 4 touchdowns??s then how you get 500 yards and 7 touchdowns.[/quote]Huh?[QUOTE] yeah thats right clinton portis has 55 touchdowns in his career. ladell betts has 9. [B]portis knows how to score[/B][/quote]Huh?!?! I know how to score too! Cross the goalline.[QUOTE] and is a better back so he has gotten more of a chance. they were both drafted in 2002 so it speaks margins about portis's ability to score no matter where from.[/quote]Huh? What? Huh? What? Who? When? Where? [URL="http://www.firejoemorgan.com/2007/07/idioms.html"]F the H?[/URL][QUOTE] if you cant see that then you are freaking blind. joe bugel is never gonna call out one of his players and he shouldnt that would be retarded....but if you believe everything you hear out of redskins park, then you are retarded.[/quote]Who are you even talking to anymore?[QUOTE] in any respect portis a better goaline runner, and yes he excells more in space also but portis is a more physical runner. ask your boy aikman who you were quoting so much earlier who is a more physical slam it in there runner, because he talked about portis's phyicality yesterday and how rare it is a guy his size runs and blocks like he does.[/quote]Pretty rare, I guess.[QUOTE] and incase you missed it, al saunders called it out that they had a wide open touchdown on the play action pass from the 1, but campbell threw under to sellers instead of a wide open cooley in the back. and incase you didnt see the third down play, watch it again and watch where sellers goes and where betts cut it into....goaline rule as a runner, let the fullback lead you and he went outside while betts cut it into the teeth, something clinton would not have done and even if he did, he doesnt go down as easy.[/quote]What in the F does this have to do with Portis?[QUOTE]

you can say all you want about my logic, smootsmack can regulate this board but you are reacting the same way i am because we dont have the same views.....attacking each other is what makes it fun....in my opinion your perspective sucks and its funny how easy it is to tell between a guy who played the game and a fan, and you just the fan, nothing wrong with being the fan because i am and have been one a long time... oh and by the way nice come back "i am not gay for the pats, your probably gay for portis" haha man you were reaching there, but to answer you yes i am gay for portis hahha[/quote]The reason Smoot has to "regulate" the board is because people like you spew garbage all over it. Look, if you aren't going to know what you are talking about, at least use good grammar and punctuation and try to trick us a little.

If you are going to be arrogant enough to call yourself "holcknowsbest", you'd better be damned sure.

Just be happy that Smoot is playing this one cool, because Skinsfan69 is not the one who is out of line here.