Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=SmootSmack;688323]fixed it for you[/quote]

Thanks! I see what I did wrong now.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

Moondog there is no jury in a civil case.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=Moondog;688198]

You are.

If I was asked on T.V. ( :yeahright) what I thought of Big Ben and replied "I believe he is a scumbag rapist." I'd be perfectly fine. I wouldn't be stating it while [I]knowing[/I] that it was untrue just to damage him. It's not defamation in this case. It's free speech. I can have an opinion about someone without a court ruling telling me it's ok to have it. Thank God.

Over 1 in 10 Americans believe Obama is the anti-christ and have stated so in print, radio and T.V.. That's some pretty serious defamation right there. Right?

As to him not being charged and the supposed low standard to press charges of sexual assault: Where are you pulling this from? Do you know this [I]beyond a reasonable doubt[/I]? :silly:

In Georgia, the DAs office makes the decision whether to press charges or not. Not the victim or the police.

What the DA needs are all the elements of the crime met to [I]beyond a reasonable doubt[/I] [B]and [/B]they need to believe that they can actually win because what DA wants to end up with egg on his face by losing a high-profile case against a star athlete? They are politicians after all and they will be only using their overworked and underpaid attorneys to battle the best criminal defense attorneys that Big Ben can afford.

Many DAs share the belief that in sexual assault cases, and especially intrafamilial ones, they actually need evidence that is beyond an [B]unreasonable[/B] doubt to even think of going forward.

Any rate, enough about this. I hold an opinion you seem to find distressingly uncompassionate and close-minded. You hold a world view that seems naive and foolish...and one that I miss holding.[/quote]

Regardless of whether anyone agrees or disagrees with this, I just have to add that this is the kind of post I appreciate- cogent, well-written and respectful. I hope you stay awhile, Moon.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=itvnetop;688332][quote=Moondog;688198][QUOTE=Pocket$ $traight;688034]Ok. So instead of an internet forum where you can say whatever you want about anybody, if you were on a TV interview and someone said, "What do you think about Big Ben?". You would answer, "He is a scumbag rapist". That would seem like an easy defamation case to me.

The standard to charge someone with sexual assault is very low. If I am not mistaken

Regardless of whether anyone agrees or disagrees with this, I just have to add that this is the kind of post I appreciate- cogent, well-written and respectful. I hope you stay awhile, Moon.[/quote]


Me too. If there is one thing the world needs is more lawyers, especially slanderous ones who criticize world views right after the casually label people rapists.

I would say the only occupation more admirable is Kate Goslin's; the person has managed to turn child exploitation and neglect into a lucrative occupation.

God bless America (and Obama the anti-christ...lol)

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

This is too f'ing funny...

[url=http://twitpic.com/1fjmzl]"What are you ladies up to tonight?" on Twitpic[/url]

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=Ruhskins;688406]This is too f'ing funny...

[url=http://twitpic.com/1fjmzl]"What are you ladies up to tonight?" on Twitpic[/url][/quote]

:laughing2

[IMG]http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r160/nalvarado1183/martintop.gif[/IMG]

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

how do you guys manage to screw up quotes so badly haha

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;688331]Moondog there is no jury in a civil case.[/quote]

If you are going to state something as fact, it helps to fact check it before opening mouth and inserting foot.

I can't post links yet so you'll have to do the work for yourself. It'll take 3 seconds.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=Moondog;688520]If you are going to state something as fact, it helps to fact check it before opening mouth and inserting foot.

I can't post links yet so you'll have to do the work for yourself. It'll take 3 seconds.[/quote]
Correct, in certain civil cases a trial by jury may be requested.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;688331]Moondog there is no jury in a civil case.[/quote]

thats not true, atleast not in north carolina. ive been selected for jury duty on several civil cases.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;688570]thats not true, atleast not in north carolina. ive been selected for jury duty on several civil cases.[/quote]

Ok I should have specified there usually isn't a jury I thought I wrote that oh well no harm no foul.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;688811]Ok I should have specified there usually isn't a jury I thought I wrote that oh well no harm no foul.[/quote]

I would have edited my other post but gotta keep the post count up.

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;688331]Moondog there is no jury in a civil case.[/quote]

ohhh yes there is.

by the way, i think this is gettin out of control. Just the way i like it. Come right on in..........d da d da .......sight on down.......d da d da..... lets lighten the mood here!!!

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

[quote=CrustyRedskin;688815]ohhh yes there is.

by the way, i think this is gettin out of control. Just the way i like it. Come right on in..........d da d da .......sight on down.......d da d da..... lets lighten the mood here!!![/quote]

i already put that i meant to type usually no jury

Re: Big Ben off the hook again.
 

suuure ya did