![]() |
Re: SF Postgame
Cooley's offensive film breakdown of the SF was really interesting.
As anemic as the offense was, the grades, excepting both QBs were pretty good. The offensive line, according to Cooley absolutely killed it across the board. Both QBs were really bad though. |
Re: SF Postgame
[quote=DYoungJelly;1268605]Cooley's offensive film breakdown of the SF was really interesting.
As anemic as the offense was, the grades, excepting both QBs were pretty good. The offensive line, according to Cooley absolutely killed it across the board. Both QBs were really bad though.[/quote] Best OL grade of the season for the unit |
Re: SF Postgame
[quote=Chico23231;1268604]The second one, pass catchers are an issue. We need more there. Add another TE and WR Curtis Samuel this offseason[/quote]
What are the pass catchers (WR/TE) graded on? Is it how many catches per targets, volume of catches whether or not they are thrown to, blocking downfield? That would be helpful. Honestly the receivers aren't targeted all that much, so I'm not sure how you can accurately assess their performance, but I don't really know because I just don't know the metrics. |
Re: SF Postgame
[url]https://twitter.com/WashingtonNFL/status/1339936879534346241[/url]
Chase Young's touchdown call in Spanish. Love it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.