Re: WFT Free Agency
 

John Keim

Looking back: Washington agreed to a 3-year deal with WR [B]Curtis Samuel[/B], giving him $23 million guaranteed. He adds the No. 1 quality they coveted most: speed. Washington had inquired about [B]Nelson Agholor and Marvin Jones[/B]. But it added a versatile player who has improved each season; creativity will be key with him.

Looks like Skins were checking Chico free agent plan at WR.

How insane would it be to grab Florida’s Kadarius Toney at 19? 3 WR sets: Samuel and Terry outside and Toney in the slot? I mean if they have him as bpa...

Right now TE and LB are our greatest need. FS and LT (draft prospect) next.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

Sharpe was fine. He only played sparingly, maybe two starts... gave up one sack. Obviously he's depth and nothing more at this point. Pretty low risk signing that makes sense.

So far it's hard to not like what they are doing (and not doing) overall. It's really too early to be doling out grades for free agency moves. We don't have the whole picture yet after a whopping two days...

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[quote=punch it in;1279690]I have never actually blocked anyone on here. I didn’t even know how. I figured it out though.[/quote]

Pretty sure I know exactly who you blocked.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

Tackle, LB, Safety and TE are top priorities in the draft. Let’s who drops to us.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

Danny Johnson is coming back.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;1279702]Pretty sure I know exactly who you blocked.[/QUOTE]



Lol. Im not big into novels....

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[QUOTE=Defensewins;1279703]Tackle, LB, Safety and TE are top priorities in the draft. Let’s who drops to us.[/QUOTE]



Yup. Id grab a RB if available in the mid to late rounds too. Of course if one of the qb’s falls to 19 id consider that. I think having Fitz around would be awesome for a young QB.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[QUOTE=Chief X_Phackter;1279701]Sharpe was fine. He only played sparingly, maybe two starts... gave up one sack. Obviously he's depth and nothing more at this point. Pretty low risk signing that makes sense.



So far it's hard to not like what they are doing (and not doing) overall. It's really too early to be doling out grades for free agency moves. We don't have the whole picture yet after a whopping two days...[/QUOTE]This.

The team is making moves that clearly address needs and it looks like they have a good understanding of how the players they are signing match up with those needs. This is how a professional organization runs. Keep the goals in sight, balance needs of the team versus the constraints that the nfl and salary cap impose, and have a 2 to 3 year vision of getting and staying on top.

Add in a touch of RR koolaid for moves like letting Sundberg walk and its a good time to be a longtime fan of this team.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

Jabril Cox (LB) out of LSU is another name that could be there in round 2 for us

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[quote=punch it in;1279709]Lol. Im not big into novels....[/quote]

Yeah, me either

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[quote=punch it in;1279709]Lol. Im not big into novels....[/quote]

Yeah some of those were crazy

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

I voted B on our FA after 3 additions.
Because all the signings we made makes absolute perfect sense and the team is improved.
But the gaping hole at LB worries me, and I really don't see what was wrong with giving KPL 3.5M/yr.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

[quote=punch it in;1279709]Lol. Im not big into novels....[/quote]

Haha I was thinking the same. My first block in nearly 13 years.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

I love the Samuel signing as long as he is in the slot.

Re: WFT Free Agency
 

We need to sign a FA linebacker today that fits are need ,we are so thin there right now it’s insane.