Re: Haynesworth trade possibly in the works
 

I think the reason they haven't already signed Adams is because they know that they will draft Tackles this year. If they sign 2 good tackles, they won't need to sign Adams.

Re: Haynesworth trade possibly in the works
 

^ They were going to sign Flozell. But then Flozell tripped Bruce Allen in the Redskins Park hallway and Allen got too mad to sign him.

Re: Haynesworth trade possibly in the works
 

[quote=lotus;690051]^ they were going to sign flozell. But then flozell tripped bruce allen in the redskins park hallway and allen got too mad to sign him.[/quote]

rotf lmao

Re: Haynesworth trade possibly in the works
 

[quote=SmootSmack;690004]With Samuels serving as the Redskins "draft runner" this year he may actually get to, in a way, officially pass the torch if Okung's name is called (or any OT's for that matter)[/quote]
Samuels as the draft runner is a smokescreen making people believe that we picked him because we're targeting a lineman and it will be a passing of the torch. This will allow us to surprise all when we take Clausen at 4, lock it up, championship!

In no way, shape or form does the opinion in this post represent the opinions of the posting author or any associate of thewarpath.net

Re: Haynesworth trade possibly in the works
 

[QUOTE=tryfuhl;690117]Samuels as the draft runner is a smokescreen making people believe that we picked him because we're targeting a lineman and it will be a passing of the torch. This will allow us to surprise all when we take Clausen at 4, lock it up, championship!

[B]In no way, shape or form does the opinion in this post represent the opinions of the posting author or any associate of thewarpath.net[/[/B]QUOTE]

You silly. LOL