Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=14897)

VTSkins897 10-10-2006 09:00 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
the entire D as a whole is sucking.

MTK 10-10-2006 09:35 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
[quote=offiss;226574]Well it's disconsurting to see another draft pick we just had to have can't beat out Warrick Holdman, whether or not Holdman is playing up to par is irrelevant, we gave up picks to get Rocky, if he is incapable of beating Holdman than there is a problem with our ability to evaluate talent.[/quote]

Williams has a history of bringing his rookie defenders along slowly, and with a vet who's playing well enough what's the rush? With the problems we have right now, tossing a rookie in the mix just might compound things.

BrunellMVP? 10-10-2006 09:42 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
Anyone but Rogers! he could be the worst corner in the NFL right now...
bold statement...but has he done anything positive?

MTK 10-10-2006 09:48 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
[quote=BrunellMVP?;226627]Anyone but Rogers! he could be the worst corner in the NFL right now...
bold statement...but has he done anything positive?[/quote]

There are plenty of guys that are far worse.

BrunellMVP? 10-10-2006 09:52 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
are any as big a disappointment?

That Guy 10-10-2006 10:09 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
[quote=BrunellMVP?;226632]are any as big a disappointment?[/quote]

rumph, ahmad carrol, quentin jammer, pacman jones... shall i continue?

JWsleep 10-10-2006 10:19 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
Rocky isn't the magic bullet. But I'd like him to get some time to get experience. I don't think Holdman has been bad this year--he's way better than last year, IMO. Doubt you'll see GW and co going to a rookie at LB. We'll see. GW has said nothing but good things about Rocky, but he's high on Holdman too.

Monkeydad 10-10-2006 10:54 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
We just need 11 Ade Jimohs and we'd be set. :)

dmek25 10-10-2006 11:23 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
im really surprised ade hasnt played more. i thought towards the end of last season he was turning into a legit nfl corner

dmek25 10-10-2006 11:24 AM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
thatguy, any thoughts on jimoh? you usually have some dirt on the thought process

Mauicruzer 10-10-2006 12:53 PM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
Yes the D has been dissapointing this season so far.I would love to see some pressure from the line would help the whole unit. However you dont win too many games with 3 measly points

#56fanatic 10-10-2006 02:05 PM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
well, somebody has to be blamed, I guess its Warrick Holdman. I think he sucks, always has. but, according to coaches he works hard, smart, in the right place. Well, what happens when the guy just flat out sucks. being in the right place isn't enought. the guy misses tackles, gets taken out of the plays to easily, is as slow as me. I say let Rocky play. cant get any worse.

offiss 10-10-2006 02:07 PM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72;226624]Williams has a history of bringing his rookie defenders along slowly, and with a vet who's playing well enough what's the rush? With the problems we have right now, tossing a rookie in the mix just might compound things.[/QUOTE]


I know, I just see rookie after rookie around the league on the field and contributing, and then see a guy who can't break through at weekside LB.

If Holdmans play has been adequet thats about it, I watched the rookie TE from Jacksonville truck him on the sideline allowing him about 4 extra yards late in the game as he ran right over the top of Holdman, I know those things are bound to happen to every player at some time during the season, it just makes you wonder why Rocky can't do a better job.

That Guy 10-10-2006 03:59 PM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
[quote=dmek25;226676]thatguy, any thoughts on jimoh? you usually have some dirt on the thought process[/quote]

he's not faster than rumph or wright. great special teamer, and while he looked okay in coverage last year, he still got beat a bit. I honestly don't think he could be much worse than what we're trotting out there right now though, and he was a LOT better last year than the previous two.

dmek25 10-10-2006 04:09 PM

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 
well, speed isnt getting wright and rumph anywhere. why not, at least, try the ade in some spots?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.60275 seconds with 9 queries