Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

You don't trade 2 all pro receivers because your o-line and QB sucks. Snyder would be stupid to trade Moss and Cooley.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

I would not say the O played like they did not want to win I'd say we had to many turn overs giving the Eagles to many easy points.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=Buster;616997]He'll get his hips broken behind this line.

"Help, Ive been sacked and I can't get up."[/quote]

I wonder if the same thing is said about Bret Farve. His plus out weight his age for me

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

AH is spot on here. The main problem with the team is that they have no heart, no fire, no desire, especially on the offensive side of the ball.

With the proper attitude we could overcome some things like JC's happy feet, center snaps to no one, etc.

But we lack attitude so we do not overcome adversity.

I hope that the next administration eliminates any and all slackers with poor attitudes. No sacred cows. We need a total attitude makeover.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=Kalisto2010;617011]You don't trade 2 all pro receivers because your o-line and QB sucks. Snyder would be stupid to trade Moss and Cooley.[/quote]

Call me crazy because I'd trade both of them. Actually, I'd cut Moss's stupid ass if I couldn't trade him, or put him special ed teams.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=Kalisto2010;617011]You don't trade 2 all pro receivers because your o-line and QB sucks. Snyder would be stupid to trade Moss and Cooley.[/quote]

You do when you have a promising starter in the wings (Davis), and you need 3/5 of a new offensive line and a new starting qb. too many holes not to entertain trades for picks, especially with the high probability of an uncapped year and little future free agency acquisitions

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

I think when Al says, "we", he means the offense.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

Mr. Haynesworth please shut up. Granted when he's got his breath and is at full strength he is a monster in the middle. The defense must be getting very sick of watching this high school offense. I know he's angry at the offense. But I just hate it when players are calling out teammates to the media.... and in an indirect kind of way that's what he's doing. Keep that shit in house.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=skinsfan69;617093]Mr. Haynesworth please shut up. Granted when he's got his breath and is at full strength he is a monster in the middle. The defense must be getting very sick of watching this high school offense. I know he's angry at the offense. But I just hate it when players are calling out teammates to the media.... and in an indirect kind of way that's what he's doing. Keep that shit in house.[/quote]

If the Skins were even a half assed team, I'd agree with you. But they aren't. They blow balls. The defense has been humiliated by these little nancies. I say call them out by name. I say let AH stick his foot up Portis' and Moss' ass. Portis has no problems talking shit about everyone else. Let him talk his way out of an AH ass whooping.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

Carter's sack total speaks volumes about Albert's value- not only his he a monster, but he makes everyone else better. The only knock i agree with is that he needs to be in better shape (to play more plays) otherwise, the man is dominant.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

maroonandblack30:

You said:
[INDENT]Rock's 1 carry was easily the most explosive an RB has looked for the SKins all year....he should get more carries.

I don't understand why Portis continues to be the feature back, he is hurt and not productive...give someone else who is hungry a chance.[/INDENT]

Here is why Portis is the feature back and will be for the rest of the year or until Clinton Portis chooses to "shut it down":


He and Danny Boy are BFFs. If the coaching staff sat Portis down and went with a backfield rotation of Betts/Cartwright and used Portis for only 2 carries in a game, both Portis and his agent Drew Rosenhaus would hit the speed dial numbers they both have for Danny Boy and there would be hell to pay in the Skins' locker room. Just like Vinny and Danny Boy are "tight", so are CP and Danny Boy...

That is why Portis doesn't have to do all the drills in camp and actually complained when Zorn actually wanted him to play in exhibition games with a new offense last year. Notice how that was curtailed this year.

That is why Portis practices only sporadically during the week. The rules for the team don't apply to him and he knows it.

What other player or coach could get away with calling out the coaching staff, bitch about the offensive game plans, complain about the quality of his OL and say how much better he would do if those guys were competent, gett into a pissing match with his blocking fullback and etc with no consequences? On any other team, a player doing that would have to be a first ballot Hall of Fame caliber player. Here all he has to be is Danny Boy's pal...

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=sportscurmudgeon;617125]maroonandblack30:

You said:
[INDENT]Rock's 1 carry was easily the most explosive an RB has looked for the SKins all year....he should get more carries.

I don't understand why Portis continues to be the feature back, he is hurt and not productive...give someone else who is hungry a chance.[/INDENT]

Here is why Portis is the feature back and will be for the rest of the year or until Clinton Portis chooses to "shut it down":


He and Danny Boy are BFFs. If the coaching staff sat Portis down and went with a backfield rotation of Betts/Cartwright and used Portis for only 2 carries in a game, both Portis and his agent Drew Rosenhaus would hit the speed dial numbers they both have for Danny Boy and there would be hell to pay in the Skins' locker room. Just like Vinny and Danny Boy are "tight", so are CP and Danny Boy...

That is why Portis doesn't have to do all the drills in camp and actually complained when Zorn actually wanted him to play in exhibition games with a new offense last year. Notice how that was curtailed this year.

That is why Portis practices only sporadically during the week. The rules for the team don't apply to him and he knows it.

What other player or coach could get away with calling out the coaching staff, bitch about the offensive game plans, complain about the quality of his OL and say how much better he would do if those guys were competent, gett into a pissing match with his blocking fullback and etc with no consequences? On any other team, a player doing that would have to be a first ballot Hall of Fame caliber player. Here all he has to be is Danny Boy's pal...[/quote]

This is why the 100 million dollar man is the only one that can do it.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=sportscurmudgeon;617125]maroonandblack30:

You said:[INDENT]Rock's 1 carry was easily the most explosive an RB has looked for the SKins all year....he should get more carries.

I don't understand why Portis continues to be the feature back, he is hurt and not productive...give someone else who is hungry a chance.
[/INDENT]Here is why Portis is the feature back and will be for the rest of the year or until Clinton Portis chooses to "shut it down":


He and Danny Boy are BFFs. If the coaching staff sat Portis down and went with a backfield rotation of Betts/Cartwright and used Portis for only 2 carries in a game, both Portis and his agent Drew Rosenhaus would hit the speed dial numbers they both have for Danny Boy and there would be hell to pay in the Skins' locker room. Just like Vinny and Danny Boy are "tight", so are CP and Danny Boy...

That is why Portis doesn't have to do all the drills in camp and actually complained when Zorn actually wanted him to play in exhibition games with a new offense last year. Notice how that was curtailed this year.

That is why Portis practices only sporadically during the week. The rules for the team don't apply to him and he knows it.

What other player or coach could get away with calling out the coaching staff, bitch about the offensive game plans, complain about the quality of his OL and say how much better he would do if those guys were competent, gett into a pissing match with his blocking fullback and etc with no consequences? On any other team, a player doing that would have to be a first ballot Hall of Fame caliber player. Here all he has to be is Danny Boy's pal...[/quote]
Well to be fair I think we caught the Eagles thinking pass and he did have a hugh hole right up the middle.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=Kalisto2010;617011]You don't trade 2 all pro receivers because your o-line and QB sucks. Snyder would be stupid to trade Moss and Cooley.[/quote]

I gotta disagree. I would trade Moss, Cooley, and Portis in a heartbeat if the price were right. Then I would use the picks or players received to build the o-line.

Re: Haynesworth says that we don't "want it"
 

[quote=Mattyk72;616865]At least AH is ballin'. I still don't understand people who take shots at him (I guess it's easy because of the $$), the guy is clearly a bright spot for the team this year.[/quote]

I know right, the guy can take down QB's with his legs.