Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Mattyk;679789]I think the thing with Spags is he knows he needs to win now to save his job. Tough to do with a rookie QB in there.[/quote]With the Rams it'd be tough to win with Peyton in there. LOL

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Mattyk;679789]I think the thing with Spags is he knows he needs to win now to save his job. Tough to do with a rookie QB in there.[/quote]

That's what i don't get...Spags and Devaney will basically be sacraficing themselves by picking Bradford. That roster is not going to win with a rookie QB. They will look more like last years Lions then last years Jets. And with a new owner coming in who will be itching to put his own people in place I can't see how those two survive to reep the rewards of the Bradford pick.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=mlmpetert;679664]Oh well i guess well have to go Okung![/quote]

Don't count your chickens..... I hear he was injured also... it was either in high school or his first year in college. Can't take him either.

My point being plenty of players come out of the draft having been injured sometime in their past. If Bradford was done and could play anymore he wouldn't be still facing the draft. Doctors would have told him he can't play anymore. Hell his shoulder doctor works for the Skins so I'm sure the Skins would know if he's worth drafting or not. Maybe they know and are throwing up front to get Clausen so the Rams don't? I don't know. I know just a few things.... one being we need a more accurate QB. OL, LB, FS, RB, and one more WR to fill ARE's spot.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;679788]Spags isn't sold knowing how bad they need a QB??? Re-enforces my points on Bradford. Hopefully Spags does get overruled and the Rams overpay for a player who will not meet up to the hype/expectations. We need to draft Clausen at #4 and be done with it.[/quote]

Well to reiterate.... I've heard the team doesn't want the high cost of a #1 pick, but keep in mind almost every team that gets to this spot is trying to move out of it saying the same thing or trying to get more picks cause they have more then one need.

I've also heard Spags job is on the line this year and he's not sold about having a Rookie QB taking over the team. Shanahan yes cause he's signed a 5yr deal, Andy Reid cause he is Philli and they won't part with him, but I heard the Rams were not happy with Spags season last year and are giving him this year to fix their problems or he's gone. Would any of you chance your career on a drafted QB who might have issues in the NFL cause he has not been tested? or throwing your whole season away and career on one good hit by a DE if Bradford gets reinjured?

I think Bradford will be healthy and ready to go. I think he'll do fine. But I'm not the one in the hot seat putting my eggs in one basket hoping it all works out at a high expense. All he really needs is a proven QB who is safe with the ball and an OL to protect them. Then throw in a few DL and he's doing great. If he can do all that plus pick up an extra pick or two and have a half decent year, then I'm sure he stays and could be developing a young QB while doing so.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;679788]Spags isn't sold knowing how bad they need a QB??? Re-enforces my points on Bradford. Hopefully Spags does get overruled and the Rams overpay for a player who will not meet up to the hype/expectations. We need to draft Clausen at #4 and be done with it.[/quote]

I'm not sure the notion a defensive minded guy like Spags is rumored to be fond of the safe, solid choice in McCoy necessarily reinforces your point.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

This is intersting news. Bradford won't sign a pre draft contract?

[url=http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=320232]PFT: Bradford won't sign a pre-draft contract [Redskins mentioned] - EXTREMESKINS.com[/url]

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SmootSmack;679799]I'm not sure the notion a defensive minded guy like Spags is rumored to be fond of the safe, solid choice in McCoy necessarily reinforces your point.[/quote]Defensive minded HCs often go with better talent on O, thinking they can "coach up" any limitations in defensive personnel.

EDIT: Actually it does reinforce my stance on Bradford, I've said all along that I anticipate he'll be a solid QB, but will take some time to get up to speed. I don't think he's worth the #4 overall, much less the #1 overall pick. I've said if Clausen was gone and the choice for us was Bradford or Okung, I go with Okung (safe, solid choice).

Of course, the rumor on Spags has no relation to my stance on Clausen.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SBXVII;679830]This is intersting news. Bradford won't sign a pre draft contract?

[url=http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=320232]PFT: Bradford won't sign a pre-draft contract [Redskins mentioned] - EXTREMESKINS.com[/url][/quote]

Why do I get the feeling that Bradford will hold out just about anywhere he signs. It'd be interesting to see how our FO would deal with him given that they have been very careful with contracts, although if they are interested in him so much maybe they'll break the bank.

I hope that if we were to draft Bradford, the FO would find a good deal for Campbell and get us more o-line help. I just hate the thought of a first-round QB playing behind our pathetic line.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

Yeah, I feel for this kid. So young and so much potential, but the Rams will just not do well with him. As far as Spag not taking him because of his job being on the line. Don't kid yourselves guys they need a QB more than anything and unless we trade Campbell for him (Don't do it!) they'll be taking Sam Bradford on April 22nd.
Let's just take Jimmy Clausen and become the next big threat in the playoff race next year or the year after. I'm so excited to see the things in here post Jimmy Clausens work out day. Remember when everyone was comparing Clausen and Bradford back in January saying Clausen was the better QB at the next level? Where has that gone, the kid hasn't thrown since and nothing has changed except Bradford shoulder being "healed"?
Mike and Bruce have nothing to worry about and I really don't think we do either. As our roster stands we are way beyond a 4-12 team and let's just hope that can get things rolling.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

From [URL="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors"]ESPN Rumors[/URL] (just more speculation I guess):

"The Washington Redskins have remained quiet in player acquisition this offseason relative to past seasons, perhaps due in part to the massive front office and coaching restructuring that took place. Still, there's been some chatter that they are a sleeping giant when it comes to possibly making some power moves involving the draft when we get closer to April 22.

But if they stay at No. 4 overall, a new report suggests that they have their Top 3 picks already lined up. [B]Rick Maese of the Washington Post has word from league sources that the team has placed a high value on Sam Bradford, Jimmy Clausen and Russell Okung[/B], and Maese writes that "it'd be a surprise if the Redskins select anyone outside of these three." These three choices are no surprise either, given that the Big Two (Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy) play the same position as Albert Haynesworth. Given what we heard following Bradford's pro day, it'll likely come down to Okung and Clausen for the 'Skins.

Update: In another possible example of pre-draft misdirection, the Redskins will host Tennessee safety Eric Berry on Wednesday, per a tweet from Jason Reid of the Washington Post."

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[QUOTE=Ruhskins;679859]From [URL="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors"]ESPN Rumors[/URL] (just more speculation I guess):

"The Washington Redskins have remained quiet in player acquisition this offseason relative to past seasons, perhaps due in part to the massive front office and coaching restructuring that took place. Still, there's been some chatter that they are a sleeping giant when it comes to possibly making some power moves involving the draft when we get closer to April 22.

But if they stay at No. 4 overall, a new report suggests that they have their Top 3 picks already lined up. [B]Rick Maese of the Washington Post has word from league sources that the team has placed a high value on Sam Bradford, Jimmy Clausen and Russell Okung[/B], and Maese writes that "it'd be a surprise if the Redskins select anyone outside of these three." These three choices are no surprise either, given that the Big Two (Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy) play the same position as Albert Haynesworth. Given what we heard following Bradford's pro day, it'll likely come down to Okung and Clausen for the 'Skins.

Update: [B]In another possible example of pre-draft misdirection, the Redskins will host Tennessee safety Eric Berry on Wednesday, per a tweet from Jason Reid of the Washington Post."[/QUOTE[/B]]

would anyone be upset if we drafted this guy?? total playmaking stud that we need in the secondary. oh yeah..... he knows how to tackle too!

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=skinsfan69;679890][QUOTE=Ruhskins;679859]From [URL="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors"]ESPN Rumors[/URL] (just more speculation I guess):

"The Washington Redskins have remained quiet in player acquisition this offseason relative to past seasons, perhaps due in part to the massive front office and coaching restructuring that took place. Still, there's been some chatter that they are a sleeping giant when it comes to possibly making some power moves involving the draft when we get closer to April 22.

But if they stay at No. 4 overall, a new report suggests that they have their Top 3 picks already lined up. [B]Rick Maese of the Washington Post has word from league sources that the team has placed a high value on Sam Bradford, Jimmy Clausen and Russell Okung[/B], and Maese writes that "it'd be a surprise if the Redskins select anyone outside of these three." These three choices are no surprise either, given that the Big Two (Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy) play the same position as Albert Haynesworth. Given what we heard following Bradford's pro day, it'll likely come down to Okung and Clausen for the 'Skins.

Update: [B]In another possible example of pre-draft misdirection, the Redskins will host Tennessee safety Eric Berry on Wednesday, per a tweet from Jason Reid of the Washington Post."[/QUOTE[/B]]

would anyone be upset if we drafted this guy?? total playmaking stud that we need in the secondary. oh yeah..... he knows how to tackle too![/quote]


I feel like we drop so many of our number one top 10 picks into the secondary that at this point lets use the pick somewhere else.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=skinsfan69;679890][QUOTE=Ruhskins;679859]From [URL="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors"]ESPN Rumors[/URL] (just more speculation I guess):

"The Washington Redskins have remained quiet in player acquisition this offseason relative to past seasons, perhaps due in part to the massive front office and coaching restructuring that took place. Still, there's been some chatter that they are a sleeping giant when it comes to possibly making some power moves involving the draft when we get closer to April 22.

But if they stay at No. 4 overall, a new report suggests that they have their Top 3 picks already lined up. [B]Rick Maese of the Washington Post has word from league sources that the team has placed a high value on Sam Bradford, Jimmy Clausen and Russell Okung[/B], and Maese writes that "it'd be a surprise if the Redskins select anyone outside of these three." These three choices are no surprise either, given that the Big Two (Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy) play the same position as Albert Haynesworth. Given what we heard following Bradford's pro day, it'll likely come down to Okung and Clausen for the 'Skins.

Update: [B]In another possible example of pre-draft misdirection, the Redskins will host Tennessee safety Eric Berry on Wednesday, per a tweet from Jason Reid of the Washington Post."[/QUOTE[/B]]

would anyone be upset if we drafted this guy?? total playmaking stud that we need in the secondary. oh yeah..... he knows how to tackle too![/quote]


I wouldn't be upset with Berry. He doesn't help with the line but if he is the best player on the board we should probably take him. Then we can use Horton's roster spot on a lineman.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;679902][quote=skinsfan69;679890]


I wouldn't be upset with Berry. He doesn't help with the line but if he is the best player on the board we should probably take him. Then we can use Horton's roster spot on a lineman.[/quote]

I'm with you on that. Only if Okung is gone and the FO doesn't like Clausen.
If either is available, let's go with the top player at the position for the positions needed.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

I heard this on Sirius this morning and Gil certainly acted like he knew something...

[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/03/30/mailbag/index.html]One respected talent evaluator can imagine Sam Bradford with Redskins - Peter King - SI.com[/url]

[B]One respected talent evaluator can imagine Bradford with Redskins[/B]

When rumors get thrown out at this time of the draft year, you have to take them with not a grain of salt, but with a salt-shaker. I usually do. But not when Gil Brandt speaks. He is money on the draft, and he knows things the rest of us don't. And he said something today on our Sirius NFL Radio show that made my eyelids hit the ceiling regarding Oklahoma quarterback Sam Bradford, who most of the western world has already assigned to St. Louis with the first pick in the April 22 first round.

"I think there's a 49-percent chance he ends up in Washington,'' Brandt told me and Randy Cross.

Hmmmm. The Rams, desperate for a quarterback, pick first. The Redskins, desperate for a quarterback, pick fourth. Sound familiar? 2004 draft, Chargers picking first, Giants fourth, and they both need quarterbacks of the future (though, in retrospect, that might have been an invented need for the Chargers, with Drew Brees on the roster). San Diego picked Eli Manning number one, and the Giants chose Philip Rivers number four, and while the Rivers pick was being walked up to the commissioner in New York, the two teams were finishing work on a trade. They swapped quarterbacks, and the Giants sent a third-round pick in 2004, and first- and fifth-round picks in 2005, to San Diego as part of the trade.

The Redskins have an owner willing to do anything to help his team, so he's not going to stand in the way of dealing a ton to St. Louis for the pick -- if football braintrust Mike Shanahan and Bruce Allen think it's a smart idea. But if the Rams were to do this, they'd have to be sure Jimmy Clausen (or Tim Tebow or Colt McCoy) would be an adequate replacement for Marc Bulger.

For the record, the Redskins don't have a third- or sixth-round pick this year, and they have no compensatory choices. They have their first-round pick (fourth overall), second (37th), fourth (103rd), fifth (135th) and seventh (211th) in house.

My money's on the 51 percent of Brandt's prediction here. I can't see the Rams passing on a player I hear they absolutely love -- unless the treasure trove they get in return could set them up with the first- and second-rounders here, plus a one next year, and they'd also have to love Clausen. Those are some very big ifs.

But I'll also have my antennae up in the coming weeks, because Brandt is Brandt, the godfather of the draft.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

I think (know?) Bradford would rather play for the Redskins. But I don't see him getting past the Rams either. I don't know what we can offer. I know they want Montgomery, but Campbell, #4, Montgomery? You have to offer more.

Maybe throw in another couple of 2011 picks, get Atogwe as well. Trade Landry to New Orleans for their 1st rounder. Get a OL there, hopefully keep our 2nd round pick, get another OL there?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SmootSmack;679999]I think (know?) Bradford would rather play for the Redskins. But I don't see him getting past the Rams either. I don't know what we can offer. I know they want Montgomery, but Campbell, #4, Montgomery? You have to offer more.

Maybe throw in another couple of 2011 picks, get Atogwe as well. Trade Landry to New Orleans for their 1st rounder. Get a OL there, hopefully keep our 2nd round pick, get another OL there?[/quote]Taking Clausen completely out of the equation, no way we should move up for Bradford. I hope the FO continues to show measured restraint.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SmootSmack;679999]
Maybe throw in another couple of 2011 picks, get Atogwe as well. Trade Landry to New Orleans for their 1st rounder. Get a OL there, hopefully keep our 2nd round pick, get another OL there?[/quote]

Who hacked Smoots account?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;680005]Taking Clausen completely out of the equation, no way we should move up for Bradford. I hope the FO continues to show measured restraint.[/quote]

Totally agree. We'd have to give up multiple picks (and possibly players as well) to move up to the #1 spot, and we have way too many needs.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SmootSmack;679999]I think (know?) Bradford would rather play for the Redskins. But I don't see him getting past the Rams either. I don't know what we can offer. I know they want Montgomery, but Campbell, #4, Montgomery? You have to offer more.

Maybe throw in another couple of 2011 picks, get Atogwe as well. Trade Landry to New Orleans for their 1st rounder. Get a OL there, hopefully keep our 2nd round pick, get another OL there?[/quote]

You think that NO would cough up a first for Landry?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Lotus;680027]You think that NO would cough up a first for Landry?[/quote]

No, 2nd or 3rd probably. And I'm not advocating the above scenario, just thinking out loud of some possibilities. If Bradford is there at #4 I would take him, but I wouldn't trade up for him.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;680005]Taking Clausen completely out of the equation, no way we should move up for Bradford. [B]I hope the FO continues to show measured restraint[/B].[/quote]

"In hopes that they draft the guy I want them to" :D

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SmootSmack;679999]I think (know?) Bradford would rather play for the Redskins. But I don't see him getting past the Rams either. I don't know what we can offer. I know they want Montgomery, but Campbell, #4, Montgomery? You have to offer more.

Maybe throw in another couple of 2011 picks, get Atogwe as well. Trade Landry to New Orleans for their 1st rounder. Get a OL there, hopefully keep our 2nd round pick, get another OL there?[/quote]

Is there any way Bradford could leverage his way to Redskins? Basically say he wont sign a contract with. Kinda like J Russell, E. Manning. Or is STL gonna throw so much green it aint gonna matter?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

You know, if the Rams could get multiple first round picks and at least one day two pick from us to have Clausen (with the #4 pick) instead of Bradford, I'm not sure how they could possibly talk themselves into thinking Bradford is worth more than that package.

I also think Gil Brandt is really out on a much weaker limb than it appears, though no one with any clout (as in, someone who is not me) is going to call him on it because of who he is.

If what he knows is that Shanahan has a hard-on for Bradford, well, I mean, how many players do you think Shanahan has passed on over the course of his career that he felt could have been complete franchise-changers? Probably one or two a season. So he's been around the block before, and knows that the picks he would trade to deliver Bradford would just end up being his future franchise changers.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=NM Redskin;680050]Is there any way Bradford could leverage his way to Redskins? Basically say he wont sign a contract with. Kinda like J Russell, E. Manning. Or is STL gonna throw so much green it aint gonna matter?[/quote]

I think they'll so much green, but who knows for sure. It'd be easier if they had the ownership situation officially resolved

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=NM Redskin;680050]Is there any way Bradford could leverage his way to Redskins? Basically say he wont sign a contract with. Kinda like J Russell, E. Manning. Or is STL gonna throw so much green it aint gonna matter?[/quote]

I hope that Bradford tells the Rams, "I have always hated the Rams and I don't think anything will change that. So I will insist on a $500 mil. contract and hold out as long as it takes to get it."

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

This Sam Bradford Pro Day sounds exactly like 2005..Alex Smith #1 overall

QB [B]Alex Smith[/B] had a tremendous workout in Salt Lake City, making his case to be the first player selected in the draft. Smith threw for 45 minutes and was lights out. His performance was so good, those in attendance gave the Utah passer an ovation at the workouts completion.

Guess who went second all the way down at #24 if the first round???

[B]Arron Rogers[/B] is one of the draft's most complete quarterbacks, but he doesn't have prototypical size. He's listed at 6-2, but is probably more like 6-1, possibly shorter. There are also concerns that he could be a system quarterback coming out of a QB friendly offense at CAL
[COLOR=darkred](Sounds alot like Jimmy Clausen)[/COLOR]

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Lotus;680091]I hope that Bradford tells the Rams, "I have always hated the Rams and I don't think anything will change that. So I will insist on a $500 mil. contract and hold out as long as it takes to get it."[/quote]

Players usually hold out for more money. Dropping to #4 gives you less leverage on arguing for more money, so this makes no sense.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Ruhskins;680180]Players usually hold out for more money. Dropping to #4 gives you less leverage on arguing for more money, so this makes no sense.[/quote]
unless you can get that QB premium.. didn't Matt Ryan do that?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=ChickenMonkey;680178]This Sam Bradford Pro Day sounds exactly like 2005..Alex Smith #1 overall

QB [B]Alex Smith[/B] had a tremendous workout in Salt Lake City, making his case to be the first player selected in the draft. Smith threw for 45 minutes and was lights out. His performance was so good, those in attendance gave the Utah passer an ovation at the workouts completion.

Guess who went second all the way down at #24 if the first round???

[B]Arron Rogers[/B] is one of the draft's most complete quarterbacks, but he doesn't have prototypical size. He's listed at 6-2, but is probably more like 6-1, possibly shorter. There are also concerns that he could be a system quarterback coming out of a QB friendly offense at CAL
[COLOR=darkred](Sounds alot like Jimmy Clausen)[/COLOR][/quote]

The Aaron Rodgers/Jeff Tedford situation reminds me a little of Clausen's situation with Weiss. People were hesitant to draft Aaron Rodgers because of previous pro QB's that came from Tedfords system (Harrington, Boller, Akili Smith but mainly Boller for this comparison). These days it's not hard to find people trying to make comparisons between Clausen and Quinn and though the jury is out on Quinn it showed that just playing in a pro style offense under Weiss and having great intangibles doesn't guarantee success.

Still it is a pro offense and I stand by the statement that we have possibly the best QB coaches in the league (Norv Turner is also up there) and I think if they're comfortable enough with Clausen we'll be more then fine.

Still interesting comparison with the 2005 draft. Spread QB vs Pro QB and the concerns of playing for a QB guru.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Dirtbag359;680184]The Aaron Rodgers/Jeff Tedford situation reminds me a little of Clausen's situation with Weiss. People were hesitant to draft Aaron Rodgers because of previous pro QB's that came from Tedfords system (Harrington, Boller, Akili Smith but mainly Boller for this comparison). These days it's not hard to find people trying to make comparisons between Clausen and Quinn and though the jury is out on Quinn it showed that just playing in a pro style offense under Weiss and having great intangibles doesn't guarantee success.

Still it is a pro offense and I stand by the statement that we have possibly the best QB coaches in the league (Norv Turner is also up there).[/quote]Good metaphor. Simile? Someone who's good at English, help.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

I'd say Aaron Rodgers is probably the very best case scenario for Clausen. If you pair him with elite receiving talent and a good (if aging) offensive line, you might have a shot at getting that.

With that in mind, I'll point out that Rodgers' perception among the league will never be higher that it is right now, and he'll fall considerably when the Packers miss the playoffs and he doesn't make the pro bowl. The change won't be in him though, it will be in his teammates.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Dirtbag359;680184]The Aaron Rodgers/Jeff Tedford situation reminds me a little of Clausen's situation with Weiss. People were hesitant to draft Aaron Rodgers because of previous pro QB's that came from Tedfords system (Harrington, Boller, Akili Smith but mainly Boller for this comparison). These days it's not hard to find people trying to make comparisons between Clausen and Quinn and though the jury is out on Quinn it showed that just playing in a pro style offense under Weiss and having great intangibles doesn't guarantee success.

[B]Still it is a pro offense and I stand by the statement that we have possibly the best QB coaches in the league[/B] (Norv Turner is also up there) and I think if they're comfortable enough with Clausen we'll be more then fine.
[/quote]

Nice post. The part in bold is a good reminder this time of year and most especially because of who we have calling the shots at Redskins Park. I don't think there's any reason to assume Bruce and Mike have fallen in love w/ Bradford the way some have. Like the excerpt above shows, so many kids have looked like future champions leading up to the draft only wallow in mediocrity forever thereafter. My intuition is our FO has a solid risk/reward strategy for us.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=GTripp0012;680185]Good metaphor. Simile? [B]Someone who's good at English, help.[/B][/quote]

Ha ha, this coming from a guy who makes me feel small, vocabulary wise in half the post I read.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=Dirtbag359;680189]Ha ha, this coming from a guy who makes me feel small, vocabulary wise in half the post I read.[/quote]Well, thanks for reading quick enough assume prepositions that I often miss...

...did you catch that? :D

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=ChickenMonkey;680178]This Sam Bradford Pro Day sounds exactly like 2005..Alex Smith #1 overall

QB [B]Alex Smith[/B] had a tremendous workout in Salt Lake City, making his case to be the first player selected in the draft. Smith threw for 45 minutes and was lights out. His performance was so good, those in attendance gave the Utah passer an ovation at the workouts completion.

Guess who went second all the way down at #24 if the first round???

[B]Arron Rogers[/B] is one of the draft's most complete quarterbacks, but he doesn't have prototypical size. He's listed at 6-2, but is probably more like 6-1, possibly shorter. There are also concerns that he could be a system quarterback coming out of a QB friendly offense at CAL
[COLOR=darkred](Sounds alot like Jimmy Clausen)[/COLOR][/quote]

Do you guys know who WE drafted that year ?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=MonkFan4Life;680191]Do you guys know who WE drafted that year ?[/quote]Can't remember. You should clue us all in.

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/03/30/mailbag/index.html]One respected talent evaluator can imagine Sam Bradford with Redskins - Peter King - SI.com[/url]

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

[quote=SmootSmack;679999]I think (know?) Bradford would rather play for the Redskins. But I don't see him getting past the Rams either. I don't know what we can offer. I know they want Montgomery, but Campbell, #4, Montgomery? You have to offer more.

Maybe throw in another couple of 2011 picks, get Atogwe as well. Trade Landry to New Orleans for their 1st rounder. Get a OL there, hopefully keep our 2nd round pick, get another OL there?[/quote]

You think New Orleans is even interested in Landry? GG likes him that much?

Re: Sam Bradford's pro day workout should clear up top of NFL draft
 

^^Carter and Landry would get New Orleans second but I dunno about they're first. Throw in Rocky and it would.