Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

Yes, Reed is a great example of "What could have been". In the end he was injury prone and not dependable. He was great for the 4 or 5 games a year that you get him, but that is not enough to be a difference maker. I wonder what anyone would trade for him, if anything?

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

Thank goodness the FO signed Vernon Davis to a modest contract. At least he posts come gametime, and he's probably our best deep threat this season.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=SouperMeister;1182512]Trading Reed this offseason would accelerate a ton of dead money against the cap.[/quote]

actually they would save about $5 million, this includes about $5 million in dead money

[url=http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/washington-redskins/cap/2018/]Washington Redskins 2018 Salary Cap Table | Spotrac[/url]

time to renegotiate his contract or cut him

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=Irrefutable;1182529]actually they would save about $5 million, this includes about $5 million in dead money

[url=http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/washington-redskins/cap/2018/]Washington Redskins 2018 Salary Cap Table | Spotrac[/url]

time to renegotiate his contract or cut him[/quote]

He is certainly a candidate to restructure and makes sense that he would to create some cap space to sign a #1 wr.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

The Glassman is officially done for 2017:
[url]https://247sports.com/nfl/washington-redskins/Bolt/Jordan-Reed-placed-on-injured-reserve--112178883[/url]

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=SouperMeister;1183073]The Glassman is officially done for 2017:
[url]https://247sports.com/nfl/washington-redskins/Bolt/Jordan-Reed-placed-on-injured-reserve--112178883[/url][/quote]

That's a good thing, he just wasn't right this season. Let him rest and recouperate. He'll be back next year. guaranteed

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

Reed played in 6 games and in 2 of those didn't even see 35% of the snaps. Solid season.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

Time to get a Donnie Warren, block-first TE. There isn't a TE on the roster that can block, which is a HUGE liability in the run game. Asking Reed and Davis to block is like asking a pig to recite Shakespeare. As Cooley has said all year, our TE's avoid contact.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=SouperMeister;1183085]Time to get a Donnie Warren, block-first TE. There isn't a TE on the roster that can block, which is a HUGE liability in the run game. Asking Reed and Davis to block is like asking a pig to recite Shakespeare. As Cooley has said all year, our TE's avoid contact.[/quote]

I'd want a TE that can do both. If you have a strictly run blocking TE you are basically giving a sign to the D that you plan to run. That's why prime TE's that can do both are so valuable.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=mooby;1183086]I'd want a TE that can do both. If you have a strictly run blocking TE you are basically giving a sign to the D that you plan to run. That's why prime TE's that can do both are so valuable.[/quote]I should have clarified, there is still a place for a receiving TE in 2 tight end sets. But as long as Jay doesn't utilize a FB in his offense, he needs a blocking TE to seal the edge. We don't have one of those on the current roster.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

3 more to IR including Reed

NBC Sports - ProFootballTalk: Washington puts three on IR, including Jordan Reedhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/12/12/washington-puts-three-on-ir-including-jordan-reed/

But remember folks we’re healthier than ever

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1183077]That's a good thing, he just wasn't right this season. Let him rest and recouperate. He'll be back next year. guaranteed[/quote]

not with the Redskins @ $10 million dollars for 2018

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1183077]That's a good thing, he just wasn't right this season. Let him rest and recouperate. He'll be back next year. guaranteed[/quote]

He'll be back to do what? Get hurt again? His body can't take the rigors of pro football.

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1183129]He'll be back to do what? Get hurt again? His body can't take the rigors of pro football.[/quote]

yeah he's good for about 5 games a yr. No point in keeping Reed

Re: #86 Jordan Reed
 

Reed is worth bringing back just as long as there’s contingency plan. I like VD and Sprinkle but we should still look to add to the TE group in the draft.