![]() |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[quote=MTK;1275272]Go big or get the F out. I don't want to dick around with some BS like Jimmy G or Darnold. Those guys are borderline upgrades to what we already have.[/quote]
Bingo. Stafford Watson Dak That's the top 3 for me |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
I'ma get the F out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a Matthew Stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.
Just sayin - Jimmy G was 5 minutes away from winning the SB last year, because he had a SB caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get [I]him[/I], but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster. |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[QUOTE=Chief X_Phackter;1275275]I'ma get the F out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a Matthew Stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.
Just sayin - Jimmy G was 5 minutes away from winning the SB last year, because he had a SB caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get [I]him[/I], but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.[/QUOTE]Go big not go stupid. We have cap space and 8 draft picks. There is a lot of maneuvering that can be done within that framework to get a qb and still build the team. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1275275]I'ma get the F out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a Matthew Stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.
Just sayin - Jimmy G was 5 minutes away from winning the SB last year, because he had a SB caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get [I]him[/I], but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.[/quote] Jimmy just can't stay healthy |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
Jimmy g is fuckin garbage
|
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[quote=MissouriSkin;1275260]Y’all killing me with these “Ron needs to show me”, “Ron needs to do what I demand or I won’t trust him anymore” or “Why ain’t this done yet” posts.[/quote]
Speak your mind newbie. If there's somebody who said something you disagree with, address them directly. Don't be vague about it. |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[quote=Chico23231;1275282]Jimmy g is fuckin garbage[/quote]
I don't know if he's garbage, but yeah I'm not a fan. |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
The Matt Stafford sweepstakes is like the fucking Catalina Wine Mixer, we cannot fuck this up
|
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Esj4k60UYAI_1wj?format=jpg&name=medium[/IMG]
|
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
If no one else is going to say the obvious, I will.
[IMG]https://i.pinimg.com/originals/05/f8/7f/05f87fd2aa9aaa237675f09f721151b7.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
I am against the costly acquisition of a QB via trade and I'll tell you exactly why. Building a team is a process that takes some time and the idea that we are "close" to being a contender because we got into the playoffs with a losing record in an abysmal division in the most abnormal NFL season ever is total bullshit. We need to build a team that can compete for a Super Bowl appearance year after year. This is not that team. We need every draft pick we can get and some key free agents before we can approach that level. And Heaven knows we can't be throwing away special young players like Montez Sweat in a deal for a QB who's not going to get us over the top. Tampa Bay didn't go after Brady until they had a strong team in place around him. That is the way to do it.
Now, how did we get this point? First, we got lucky and made the playoffs. At that point, I think RR started to overrate his team. Then, the evil genius Dan Snyder started to work on him. You see, it is time for Snyder to awaken from his slumber and prepare to personally select the next starting QB for his franchise. Nobody needs to agree with his selection because he will order it to be done. This may be the single most satisfying use of his power as team owner. What a boner he's going to get when he does it again! I think it's a major reason why he wanted to own the team. The "we're close" mantra is way too familiar to me. We have heard that many times throughout Snyder's ownership. Maybe it's because Snyder asks the executives he hires "Are we close yet?" on a daily basis. You see, he just doesn't have the patience for a team build. That's because he's also a dumb shit fan like us. And now we're all excited about making the playoffs and we're ready to fall for Snyder's same old ignorant "we're close" bullshit until he personally selects his next disastrous man-crush QB. |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
Do we have to wait until March to make a trade?
|
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1275294]Do we have to wait until March to make a trade?[/quote]
No, Alex was traded on SB week 3 years ago |
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
If this team gets Aaron Rodgers and 1 more WR, they are the favorite next yr
|
Re: Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available
[quote=skinsfaninok;1275298]If this team gets Aaron Rodgers and 1 more WR, they are the favorite next yr[/quote]
Favorite for what? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.