Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   SF Postgame (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=64762)

SFREDSKIN 12-14-2020 12:18 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;1268392]Graded on D

CY = 77
CURL = 73
SWEAT = 73
KPL =72
PAYNE = 71
DARBY = 71

Offense

Rouiller - 91
Lucas - 83
Thomas - 79
B.S - 76[/quote]

Who the fuck does this grading? Young and Curl should be 110.

skinsfaninok 12-14-2020 12:20 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1268394]Who the fuck does this grading? Young and Curl should be 110.[/quote]


They’re gonna be lower than expected because Payne, Sweat, Allen and Young all rushed the passer 35+ times and only 2 of them had more than 2 pressures

SunnySide 12-14-2020 12:20 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
OK - thank you for posting. surprised CY is not in the 80s

resign Chase please

Lucas is doing decent on the left side. hes not dominant, doesnt seem to open holes, cant be asked to pull or move out into space ... but hes playing decent.

Wes Schweitzer injury ... did he come back into the game? I didnt notice Wes Martin looking bad out there.

skinsfaninok 12-14-2020 12:21 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=SunnySide;1268397]OK - thank you for posting. surprised CY is not in the 80s

resign Chase please

Lucas is doing decent on the left side. hes not dominant, doesnt seem to open holes, cant be asked to pull or move out into space ... but hes playing decent.

Wes Schweitzer injury ... did he come back into the game? I didnt notice Wes Martin looking bad out there.[/quote]

I'm surprised he isn't 80 but I can see why if he didn't get as many pressures as we thought.

It was the best grade the OL has gotten in a game this season

MTK 12-14-2020 12:22 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
Proof that grades can be so worthless. CY wrecked that game.

skinsfaninok 12-14-2020 12:25 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=MTK;1268400]Proof that grades can be so worthless. CY wrecked that game.[/quote]

He def did, it's aslo very hard to get 80 or 90.. 70's are good

SFREDSKIN 12-14-2020 12:25 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
Curl had an Int for a 76 yard td, 2 passes defended, 7 tackles and a QB hit, how does he get a low score. Bullshit!!

SunnySide 12-14-2020 12:27 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
Ive learned one thing this week.

Skins vs Niners week .. fires SFred up!

----

A 80 plus grade is great, 70s is good.

OK - how many total 80 and 90 grades do they tend to give out per week? I imagine they give out maybe 10 grades of 90 plus a week.

Sounds like CY had lots of 1 on 1 matchups that effected his grade.

skinsfaninok 12-14-2020 12:29 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1268402]Curl had an Int for a 76 yard td, 2 passes defended, 7 tackles and a QB hit, how does he get a low score. Bullshit!![/quote]

He gave up 57% of his targets which can drive the grade down some. It's not like SF didn't have success moving the ball guys

mooby 12-14-2020 12:54 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;1268404]He gave up 57% of his targets which can drive the grade down some. It's not like SF didn't have success moving the ball guys[/quote]

That's what I'm saying.

We made plays, kudos to CY, Curl, etc. because we had impact plays and the two td's were game winners thanks to the O being shut down, but there was also 2+ drives where Kyle's zone scheme was going for almost 10 yards a run and they were moving the ball with success. We won the turnover battle and scored 17 off turnovers.

I'm not surprised the grades are what they are. Did anybody forget the first quarter? Steelers rushed for 21 the entire game, I think the 49ers had almost 50 by the end of the first quarter. They tightened up but there was a time in the second half where they relaxed a bit too, I think it was right after the Curl pick-six.

We definitely have some things to work on for Seattle, Russell Wilson will tear this d up if we don't play better.

Chief X_Phackter 12-14-2020 01:01 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
The in-game adjustments have been nice, but the early game plan has been garbage.

Chico23231 12-14-2020 01:40 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;1268396]They’re gonna be lower than expected because Payne, Sweat, Allen and Young all rushed the passer 35+ times and only 2 of them had more than 2 pressures[/quote]

Hey can you post the San Fran oline grades across the board?

skinsfaninok 12-14-2020 01:49 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
[quote=Chico23231;1268414]Hey can you post the San Fran oline grades across the board?[/quote]

Trent - 76
Mike M - 67
McKivitz- 62.4
Brunskill - 61
Tomlinson - 59

sdskinsfan2001 12-14-2020 01:55 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
Looks like Trent vs. Chase was a damn good matchup. Although Chase doesn't always line up on that side, because he's a freak.

Chief X_Phackter 12-14-2020 01:56 PM

Re: SF Postgame
 
Their best grade was equal to the WFT worst grade.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.08926 seconds with 9 queries