Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

Please tell me that Rocky is going to get some playing time. Warrick Holdman has been beat so many times in coverage, its ridiculous. He missed a bunch of tackles. Last year, we were vulnerable to the big run play on his side, until he was replaced by Arrington. Get him out and put Rocky in!!

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

I agree totally. He was the problem last year and I think he is the problem this year. He is just not good at all. I'm glad Lemar is back in the middle. Now Holdman needs to be removed totally out of Redksins Park.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

Holdman is only one factor in a bevy of factors for this atrocious defense. If we had a defensive line worth a nickel, Holdman, Marshall and Marcus Washington would be making a hell of a lot more noise. Right now, the front four absorbs everything, never gets penetration, and when lined up against an offense committed to running the ball, they'll get run on.

Not only that, the secondary hasn't been able to cover [B]ANYBODY[/B] yet. There are fundamental breakdowns all over this defense. Singling out Warrick Holdman is like General George Custer raising hell with a poor marksman at the Battle of Little Big Horn.

Still, I also wonder what the coaches are afraid of at this point by playing Rocky Mac.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

I think you are right. They seem as if they are not happy with what they have seen. He has hardly played a down, maybe non on defense. Williams odviously will let a rookie play. Look at Golston. He let Taylor play some his first year.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

Let's just bench or cut everyone and call it a season.

There are other guys playing worse than Holdman.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

[QUOTE=chris36;226488]I think you are right. They seem as if they are not happy with what they have seen. He has hardly played a down, maybe non on defense. Williams odviously will let a rookie play. Look at Golston. He let Taylor play some his first year.[/QUOTE]

Good point. Golston has played, though admittedly, only because Saleve'a has been nicked up -- and since this team continues to ignore the defensive line, Williams had no choice but to play him. Then there's Taylor, so yeah, Williams hasn't shied away from throwing his rookies to the wolves, at least for a play here and there.

What's wrong with McIntosh? Why haven't we seen him yet?

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

With the problems we've had on defense GW probably doesn't want to toss any more rookies or inexperienced guys in there than he has to. Holdman is a vet who's not playing all that bad, not bad enough to warrant being benched that's for sure. Why add to the problems at this point?

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

can Rocky play corner?

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

Rocky looks like a potential playmaker with his speed and athleticism. Perhaps GW will work him into pass defense packages as he did with Chris Clemons last season.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

I was just thinking of Chris and wondering if he could come back now, for those passing situation.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

R us freakin kidding me Warrick is terrible maybe you better check your stats , he had 8 tackles in the game I believe just one behind Lemar Marshall you had 9. Many of the redskins defense missed tackles on Sunday. Also Warrick is right up there in the team ranks as far as overall tackles for the year and he does not even plays the entire game he comes out when they run that sorry ass nickle package. Warrick Holdman on defense is the least of our worries dude!

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

Too bad we didn't take Thomas Howard in the draft instead of Rocky. Howard is a former saftey with great speed and would be much better in coverage. He is starting for the Raiders and it looks like Krik Morrison,Mike Huff, and him are the only thing going for that team on D.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

Well it's disconsurting to see another draft pick we just had to have can't beat out Warrick Holdman, whether or not Holdman is playing up to par is irrelevant, we gave up picks to get Rocky, if he is incapable of beating Holdman than there is a problem with our ability to evaluate talent.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

[quote=tika49;226531]R us freakin kidding me Warrick is terrible maybe you better check your stats , he had 8 tackles in the game I believe just one behind Lemar Marshall you had 9. Many of the redskins defense missed tackles on Sunday. Also Warrick is right up there in the team ranks as far as overall tackles for the year and he does not even plays the entire game he comes out when they run that sorry ass nickle package. Warrick Holdman on defense is the least of our worries dude![/quote]

watch the game, not the stat line. he's not doing so hot. i mean, arch had 10 tackles, but he wasn't exactly a decisive factor in our win over the giants... oh yeah, i forgot, we lost. and gave up 500 yards in doing so.

Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
 

its more than holdman. and i sgree with matty. why put a rookie into this diaster? rookies = rookie mistakes