Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII
I have to imagine MS started this whole mess to get his son lined up for a HCing job. So.... I'd move MS to his front office job solely, but he can help out if need be. I'd then make KS the HC, cause I'm not sure all the Skins issue's center around KS and possibly more MS tinkering trying to tweek the offense. I then would give Kubiak the OC job cause just as you said together they have won more games then lost, hopefully the magic can continue. However, Since I'm already in the fire Shanahan and Co. I would probably only give them a one more year contract or three year at the most. The deal breaker is I would want Alex Gibbs to come work his magic with the OL or if nothing else be a consultant to the OL.
Kubiak would have less stress as a OC and could sit in the booth all day. If A.Gibbs won't come back as OL coach then maybe he can just get paid a ton to be a consultant like he is now in Denver and sit in the booth with Kubiak.
Next I'd fire Haslett and bring in another 3-4 DC, simply to try and keep continuity instead of starting completely over again on defense. However I'd easily go with Lovie and his "Tampa Two" if he could be swindled into just taking a DC job. He's a really good DC, but reminds me of Norv Turner.
|
I Like this idea of MS becoming Team President alone, however it would be harder than it sounds. KS is currently in a pissing match with our star QB, that we mortgaged the future for. Can you imagine the backlash if he became HC.
Kubiak and his health is a concern, honestly hiring him as a both consultant may be the only option. In that role he can oversee how KS is doing with the play calling, how the WR are being taught under Kyle's boy and the QB coaching as well. Alex Gibbs would be a heist, if we could get him. Did you read the article in the Washington Post where Chris Foerster basically said that the backup players are ready but Shanahan has chosen the Vets? CYA mode over at Redskins Park.
Washington Redskins’ 2012 offensive line draft picks still have much to prove - The Washington Post