View Single Post
Old 03-01-2015, 10:17 AM   #35
SolidSnake84
Playmaker
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
What you say is not outside the realm of possibility, IMO. Nevertheless, RGIII still needs to perform well on the field to keep the job. Dan Snyder won't save him if he continues to play poorly.

Since we're rebuilding, I can wait out the QB decision.
I think i disagree with the RG3 needs to play well part. I think if Dan is convinced that RG3 should be the guy, then there is no stopping him. Who is going to change his mind?

Rebuilding is a term that we use to loosely here. Our problem was, is, and will always be, we have one guy (Mr. Snyder) who believes that he "knows" players, and "knows" the game of football well enough that he can make all these decisions himself. Dan doesn't know either of these things. I still do not understand why he has hired a GM when everybody knows that DS is always going to make the final call.

Here is a conversation that will NEVER take place at Redskins Park:

Coach / GM, etc: "Mr. Snyder, we understand that you want RG3 to be our unquestioned starter, but all of us have reviewed game film, spoken with other scouts, talent evaluators, coaches, etc.. and the general consensus here and among the NFL is that RG3 can't play the position well enough to get wins. Continuing to play him is setting back this team and hurting the growth of other positions that rely on good QB play."

Dan Snyder: "Well, i guess you're right, it looks like i was mistaken in my evaluation of RG3. Thanks for explaining. We need to put the BEST players on the field in order to have the best chance of winning"
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.69442 seconds with 10 queries