According to the article above, they are supposed to consider the on field performance.
They didn't here and the article clears it up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
Why yes, it was a masterpiece conspiracy amongst the voters to deliberately come up just short of the 80% needed for induction.
I mean seriously, it's the Hall of Fame. Not the stats of fame. If stats were the only measurement, he'd be in. But you're lying to yourself if you don't think they wouldn't or shouldn't factor the intangibles, like whether you were a good teammate (I would say no based on the constant controversies and the constant bouncing around) or whether you didn't give two shits about team success as long as you got yours.
|
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk