Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Young in Pro Bowl - Nashville, Tennessee - Saturday, 02/03/07 - Tennessean.com
He had a good year, but he certainly doesn't deserve to go over Chad Pennington, who in my opinion was the main difference between the 4-12 2005 team and the 10-6 2006 team.
Chad Pennington 313/485 64.5% 3352 yards 6.9 yards/att 17 TDs 16 INTs
Vince Young 184/357 51.5% 2199 yards 6.2 yards/att 12 TD 13 INTs
The probowl selection process is becoming laughable.
|
They are opposite types of QB's.
Your stats are misleading because you ommited some important game winning stats/ TD's.
Vince Young had 19 TD's and 13 INT's. He also rushed for 552 yards at 6.7 yards per carry and 7 TD's. Why are going to deny Young's 7 rushing td's, because QB's should only be judged by their passing game? He did earn those TD's. Qb's are allowed to run and it is a nice weapon to have, Steve Young had a great career as a mobile QB.
If you add in ALL of their accomplishments in 2006:
C. Pennington had a TOTAL of 17 TD's & 16 INT's & 109 yds rushing
Vince Young had a TOTAL of 19 TD's & 13 INT's & 552 yds rushing
Plus add that Pennington played in three more games than Young and that Young is a rookie. IMO Advantage : Young