09-12-2007, 04:24 PM
|
#85
|
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Are We Being Too Hard on Brandon Lloyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10
We're getting way too caught up in this argument over Lloyd's effort on the end zone interception. To me, that's just a small piece of the puzzle.
The bottom line, the guy had one catch for five yards on Sunday. This after last year doing jack squat last year. Randle El struggled last year, and was brought into this offense at the same time as Lloyd, but he seemed to have caught on just fine on Sunday, putting up 5 catches for 108 yards (if you remove the flukey hail mary). What's Lloyd's excuse?
And Daseal, don't give me this crap about him not getting looks. The reason Randle El got the looks is because he ran very precise routes, and JC had confidence he'd be where he was supposed to be. 90% of a WRs job is getting open, making the catch is only 10% of the work. Lloyd just doesn't get open because he doesn't work hard enough to master the playbook, he could care less about learning the intracacies of route-running because all he wants to do is burn dudes deep.
I mean at what point can we just call a spade a spade. If it quacks, it's a duck. Not a hen, not a rooster, not a swan... it's a friggin duck people. Same damn thing happened with Ramsey, and it's happening with Lloyd. People see flashes every now and then, so they think if we just give him more looks, or if we just give him a chance, he'll be OK. No. He sucks. It's not that hard to make the judgment. He's a piece of shit because of his poor work ethic, and it's not going to get markedly better. Book it.
|
Bingo.
If what SS is right then the reason he doesn't get looks is because he isn;t where he is supposed to be. No QB in this league will take the time to look around the field for a guy running a wrong route. They just progress to the next target. At the end of the day Schneed hit it on the head. You are what you are and BL is a guy who hasn't nearly lived up to his contract. No other way to look at it to me.
|
|
|