|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
I've read the whole post. Going back to the OP, the question was asked, "Is Fred Smoot and asset or a liability in the secondary" and NOT specifically a certain player position in the secondary. With that said, the answer is that Smoot is an asset, and it appears by this post that you also now agree.
|
You are absolutely right. I thought it was implied in my original post (but obviously it wasn't) that I was talking about his current role as the #2. That is the context in which most people discussed this. I am still on the fence about that question.
When expanded to talk about being a #1 or a #3, I feel very solid in my opinion of those.
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
|