Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Shane · 01-20-2005, 03:55 AM

Yes, I agree the Washington Times piece is out of touch with reality. It's embarassing - but this is the Washington Times, which is an embarassment to journalism.

Moss will not be a Redskin - it doesn't matter at this point what Dan Snyder wants. His only claim to credibility is that he brought back Joe Gibbs. Gibbs has the authority now. If Snyder had failed, you would have soon seen the kind of signs and t-shirts worn to 49er games this past season "Save the Niners - Dump York". Snyder was becoming a joke in the sporting world and he has to stay out of the true decision making picture.

Gibbs is not going to want Moss on the team. The Redskins will only take on team oriented players because Gibbs and the staff know that success is first based on creating a co-operative spirit of unity and Moss lacks the common sense to understand that by all appearances.

01-20-2005, 03:55 AM	#3
Shane Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 277	Yes, I agree the Washington Times piece is out of touch with reality. It's embarassing - but this is the Washington Times, which is an embarassment to journalism. Moss will not be a Redskin - it doesn't matter at this point what Dan Snyder wants. His only claim to credibility is that he brought back Joe Gibbs. Gibbs has the authority now. If Snyder had failed, you would have soon seen the kind of signs and t-shirts worn to 49er games this past season "Save the Niners - Dump York". Snyder was becoming a joke in the sporting world and he has to stay out of the true decision making picture. Gibbs is not going to want Moss on the team. The Redskins will only take on team oriented players because Gibbs and the staff know that success is first based on creating a co-operative spirit of unity and Moss lacks the common sense to understand that by all appearances.