Quote:
Originally Posted by skinster
In my double post (sorry) I'd like to say that there is next to no way were going to trade either cooley or davis. That is simply because we cannot get value for either. Davis is has not produced enough to get high compensation for, and we will not trade him for anything less than we drafted him for. Cooley I feel we would not trade for anything other than a first because that is what we value him at. I do not feel like there is a market for giving up a first rounder for cooley. He will be 28 next season (not that old, I know), and he is coming off a season ending injury, which means that his next season will probably not be so great and it means that he will not be able to produce to his potential for more than a few years after. But even ignoring his age and injury, his numbers are not worth a first. He seems to be able to produce about 60-65 catches for 750 yards and 6 tds consistently which is not worth a first rounder. Also he is known for drops, which is not good. If davis has a stellar second half of the season, I personally would trade cooley for a second, but know that redskins management wont
edit: Winslow, Shockey, and Gonzolez all went for seconds. Cooley is not more valuable than any of them
|
Huh? First of all, he'll be back on the field in two weeks probably. Secondly, he is in the midst of his prime. I see no reason why we won't get 4 or 5 more pro-bowl caliber years out of Chris. Third, how does the fact that he broke a bone in his ankle mean he won't be able to produce down the road? That makes zero sense. And fourth, he's "known for drops?" Not at all. He's got the best hands on our team, and is a monster after the catch. He's had a fumble here and there, but who hasn't? I don't have a big issue with a fumble or two per year out of a guy who sees around 90 targets a year.
Not sure where you're getting this stuff from.