View Single Post
Old 12-01-2010, 12:50 PM   #70
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Where was Keiland Williams???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
but if anyone actually thinks that Keiland Williams is a good back there is no hope for them.
Why? Because he was on the practice squad?
You know there are a bunch of backs, good backs that came off the practice squad right?
And where did i say anything about what type of back Keiland is good or bad?
The most i said was that he was the most experienced of the 2 backs we had available.

Let me remind you what i said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
You have to run the ball with the RBs more then 9 times.
We have no idea how the running game would have panned out if we actually tried to run the ball.
We're an outside zone/outside edge running team (and the Vikings run weakness is on the edge w/ their Jared Allen and a back-up! LDE) yet we ran inside w/ our least experienced RB: James Davis when Keiland Williams was perfectly healthy.
But it either way 6 carries for James Davis and 3 carries for Keiland Williams is not enough to establish a running game.
Quote:
He didn't deserve more carries against the Vikings. If he had had 30 carries he wouldn't have broken 75 yards.
Your argument is all over the place and your post above clearly shows you are missing my point.
We didn't need nor did i say Keiland would have rushed for 100 yards.
No.
I'm saying something quite simple.
Regardless of the RB an offense makes thing harder on itself when they abandon the run.
That's all i've been saying.
Even if you think Keiland is the worst RB on earth, quiting on the run is always the wrong move.
The stat line from your post would have been enough of a semblance of running game to prevent the Packers defense from focusing on the passing game only.
Your post actually makes my point.

Quote:
He is a practice squad runningback who couldn't even start for his college team....Nothing more, nothing less. He probably won't even make the team next year.
Again this more fluff.
And technically Foster was a part time starter himself.
Either way it has nothing to do with my point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
68 yards on 23 carries against the titans.
5 yards on 3 carries against the vikings.

Case closed.
And yet again you make my point.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.19256 seconds with 10 queries