Quote:
Originally Posted by Monksdown
I take Snyder's side on this one. And i can honestly say that other than firing Cerrato twice, i haven't agreed with him on much. The article, while accurate was inflamatory and tasted a little too much of yellow journalism. I mean, yes he cut down trees that didn't belong to him and were protected. But did he go 'agent orange' on them?
And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.
I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.
|
I don't understand how it can be like yellow journalism if it's accurate. The man gave you what has transpired during Snyder's tenure and even sourced his article with links.
What country does your ass think you live in to think you're entitled to 2 million dollars for an unfaltering picture of you? You're silly.
Snyder is a cunt, it' doesn't matter whether he is Jewish or not and no one gives a shit what he is. If you're offended by the picture of him I sympathies but the shit he has done is truly despicable. Snyder is a despicable loathsome man and it's all his own doing. I am officially done buying Redskins product and supporting that little weasel.