Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69
I can't stand it when people say this cause it's total 100% BS! When the team was under his control he went out and spent money. Does Dana Stubblefield and Dan Wilkonson ring a bell??? It's water under the bridge cause JKC dicked his own son, but there is NO QUESTION in my mind that we'd be in MUCH better hands had John Cooke kept the team.
|
2 high priced FA's that were pretty much busts.
So how would things have without question been different?
Just because they shared the same name doesn't make John would have been a great owner.