Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

GMScud · 04-25-2011, 08:11 PM

I shudder at the thought of taking a RB at #10. You certainly have your rare exceptions with guys like Chris Johnson and AP, but in today's NFL, it just seems silly to spend a high pick on a RB.

Every year it's more and more of a committee approach in NFL backfields. Running backs typically don't last long, and defensive players are flying around crushing guys more and more every year. I just don't think the value is there like it used to be.

04-25-2011, 08:11 PM	#56
GMScud Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 12,626	Re: Mark Ingram at #10? I shudder at the thought of taking a RB at #10. You certainly have your rare exceptions with guys like Chris Johnson and AP, but in today's NFL, it just seems silly to spend a high pick on a RB. Every year it's more and more of a committee approach in NFL backfields. Running backs typically don't last long, and defensive players are flying around crushing guys more and more every year. I just don't think the value is there like it used to be. __________________ Tardy