Quote:
Originally Posted by Landry44
LMAO! I never reversed my position. Someone on here said, I'm not sure who, "I'm not sold on Landry Jones." Landry Jones is a great qb and I not once said that he wasn't. I never reversed my position on that. All I'm saying is that I believe that RG3 is a better fit for what we do here based on his mobility and accuracy. Now if I had said that I was no longer sold on Landry Jones then you would have a point.
|
Gotcha. Here is, maybe, a consideration for you. Rather than question a person's entire college FB knowledge in a post, discuss it. Here is the original post from Big C:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C
not sold on landry jones as an elite prospect. like i said RGIII is my favorite and i think he would fit perfectly in our system. accurate, a leader, and extremely mobile. plus he just keeps getting better. kellen moore would be good too, regardless of arm strength issues. hes smart, reads the game well, is extremely accurate, a winner, and has a quick release.
tannehill is a good shout, but i dont know about top 3.
|
to which you said (in response to Lotus - not displayed here) :
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landry44
Because he obviously don't know anything about football. Landry Jones is the second best qb in this draft.
|
But yet in your statement to GMScud, you are in agreement with BigC's second statement which is a well worded brief description of why he likes RGIII.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landry44
What is so confusing about what I'm saying? Landry Jones and Matt Barkley are both very good qbs, but RG3 is a better fit for what we do here. He's more accurate and more mobile than both Jones and Barkley. Do you disagree? If you disagree then you're only exposing your lack of football knowledge. If you agree then what are we talking about here?
|
So if you agree with BigC's overall point that RGIII fits better here, then maybe Big C has some reasonable CFB knowledge, and if you agree LJ is the 2nd best QB in the draft, then maybe GMScud has reasonable CFB knowledge, and you simply disagree with parts of each of their assessments.
Again, the point is rather than attacking knowledgeable fans of CFB, why not simply discuss the areas you disagree?
No one here is psychic, and most of us are simply having discussions about what we see based on our history and background knowledge, and we have the discussions because we all have a common interest in seeing the Redskins be the best team in the league year in and year out.