Quote:
Originally Posted by juskins
You use the word "hate" associated with my posting, not my choice of word.
The bottom line with Dan Snyder is the dollar. As with other owners. But the difference with Dan Snyder has been itemized by the article in the law suit. I just don't think that Mr. Snyder gives a hill of beans about his loyalties to the Washington Redskins. It's an investment first and foremost and not this BS about his life long love for the Redskins.
Little boy in a candy shop is not a good analogy of Dan's reckless ownership of this franchise. The maverick who is not a maverick in terms of showing a positive direction of owning a franchise that had some moxie during the time when Dan bought it.
Let's hope Mike Shanahan and Bruce Allen can restore it to respectability again without Dan Snyder's interference.
So, hate is the wrong word. Disrespect is the right word in describing my present feelings towards Mr. Snyder.
|
Without debating whether DS "wants to win" or "cares about the Redskins", I would just say that based on my observation & the reactions he's spurred from some around him, I don't see the Danny as being a good leader. I won't question all his intentions, but it just doesn't seem he has the ability to truly drive others toward success, rather he commands respect, loyalty & complicity to his demands at the expense of progress toward the greater goal.