Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WFT's Off-Season Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2021, 10:36 AM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Since Kirk left he's 25-21-1 in Minnesota. We're 17-31. Sorry but Kirk wins again.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 10:45 AM   #2
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Since Kirk left he's 25-21-1 in Minnesota. We're 17-31. Sorry but Kirk wins again.
Yop, and don't forget to factor in that WE (well Bruce Allen) put him in a situation to get that massive contract which impended Minnesota's ability to keep building around him. We probably could've had him for half the avg/yr he's making now. That would have allowed to build a solid team around him.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:21 AM   #3
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 42
Posts: 20,609
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Since Kirk left he's 25-21-1 in Minnesota. We're 17-31. Sorry but Kirk wins again.
Wins a bigger participation trophy. Good for him.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime."
"Bulls**t. You can be mine."
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:26 AM   #4
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
Wins a bigger participation trophy. Good for him.
Significantly better record than us that's for sure, and a playoff win too.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:27 AM   #5
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Since Kirk left he's 25-21-1 in Minnesota. We're 17-31. Sorry but Kirk wins again.
I think it is ridiculous for people to say that Kirk is a scrub and that Heinecke is better than him.

That being said, I don't think Kirk gets us to 25-21-1 had he stayed in our team. He would have given us stability at the position, but we wouldn't have had the offensive pieces he's had in Minnesota.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:33 AM   #6
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I think it is ridiculous for people to say that Kirk is a scrub and that Heinecke is better than him.

That being said, I don't think Kirk gets us to 25-21-1 had he stayed in our team. He would have given us stability at the position, but we wouldn't have had the offensive pieces he's had in Minnesota.
It's tough to compare QBs since they don't have the same personnel around them.

He's hands down better than anyone we have had since he left though.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:50 AM   #7
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I think it is ridiculous for people to say that Kirk is a scrub and that Heinecke is better than him.

That being said, I don't think Kirk gets us to 25-21-1 had he stayed in our team. He would have given us stability at the position, but we wouldn't have had the offensive pieces he's had in Minnesota.
We'll never know because we let that ship sail. And then we failed to trade him once it was obvious he wasn't coming back. So many mistakes.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:31 AM   #8
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Since Kirk left he's 25-21-1 in Minnesota. We're 17-31. Sorry but Kirk wins again.
Minnesota was 21 - 11 with Keenum and Bradford. KC was a significant downgrade because of his contract value versus the cap. They had to cut or not sign significant pieces because an average to slightly above average QB demanded and received top 3 salary. Like you said, Dak (and KC at the time) got the pay because that is what you had to do to sign a qb in their market, but I am glad we didn't pay KC, and if AS hadn't gotten hurt, records would bear out that we paid less for a better end result.

The point of all of this isn't to rehash KC - you brought him up, but to look at the effect of paying a non elite qb elite money. Better to roll with a mid level and build up the team around him. No matter what, the qb spot will always be a problem that very few teams find long term elite answers for.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 11:39 AM   #9
BaltimoreSkins
Pro Bowl
 
BaltimoreSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,798
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Minnesota was 21 - 11 with Keenum and Bradford. KC was a significant downgrade because of his contract value versus the cap. They had to cut or not sign significant pieces because an average to slightly above average QB demanded and received top 3 salary. Like you said, Dak (and KC at the time) got the pay because that is what you had to do to sign a qb in their market, but I am glad we didn't pay KC, and if AS hadn't gotten hurt, records would bear out that we paid less for a better end result.

The point of all of this isn't to rehash KC - you brought him up, but to look at the effect of paying a non elite qb elite money. Better to roll with a mid level and build up the team around him. No matter what, the qb spot will always be a problem that very few teams find long term elite answers for.
I think alot of that is on the GM though his cap hit wasn't that much in 2020 or now in 2021. It will be a doozy in 2022 though! https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/minnesot...-cousins-9915/
BaltimoreSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 06:05 PM   #10
SkinsGuru
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 724
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Since Kirk left he's 25-21-1 in Minnesota. We're 17-31. Sorry but Kirk wins again.
Casey Keenum was 11-3 with that roster minus the upgrades they added for Kirk. they had a great defence and kick ass receivers with one of the best running games in the league. Kirk was supposed to be the move to get them over the hump and into the superbowl . . . but instead they regressed BAD with kirk at the helm.
SkinsGuru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 08:36 PM   #11
rocnrik
Playmaker
 
rocnrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,789
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsGuru View Post
Casey Keenum was 11-3 with that roster minus the upgrades they added for Kirk. they had a great defence and kick ass receivers with one of the best running games in the league. Kirk was supposed to be the move to get them over the hump and into the superbowl . . . but instead they regressed BAD with kirk at the helm.
Yep ... that’s the way it is !
rocnrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.89452 seconds with 11 queries