Michael Irvin accused of rape

[Dirtbag59]

How strong is the evidence here? I mean a polygraph test? Those things are a crock. I saw one case where a man met up with a couple in a forest once and the guy ended up shooting the husband and their dog in what he initially explained as a hunting accident, then raped the wife over the course of a week or so.

He let her go so long as she promised not to tell the cops. However soon after she rescinded on her promise and eventually the lack of evidence at the time called for a polygraph test. The man passed with flying colors. The woman on the other hand failed miserably. So how did this come to pass?

Well apparently polygraphs measure emotion, so when the women was asked about the rape she was obviously shook up. The guy on the other hand was a cold blooded killer with minimal remorse.

Eventually ballistics proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the guys story of a hunting accident was false and some other evidence came in that eventually proved the rape.

She should have gone to the cops back in 2007. This personally just sounds like a money grab. At the very least it's an attempt to break up Irvins marriage. Irvin insist that he's been faithful and changed his ways so his wife has stayed with him in spite of his infidelity.